Since Friedrich Schleiermacher s work in the 1800s, scholars
interested in the literary dimension of Plato s writings have
sought to reconcile the dialogue form with the expository
imperative of philosophical argument. It is now common for
mainstream classicists and philosophers to attribute vital
importance to literary form in Plato, which they often explain in
terms of rhetorical devices serving didactic goals. This study
brings the disciplines of literary and classical studies into
methodological debate, questioning modern views of Plato s dialogue
form.
In the first part of this book, David Schur argues that the
literary features of Plato s dialogues when treated as "literary
cannot be limited to a single argumentative agenda. In the second
part, he demonstrates the validity of this point by considering a
rhetorical pattern of self-reflection that is prominent in the
Republic." He emphasizes that Plato s book consistently undermines
the goal-driven conversation that it portrays. Offering a
thought-provoking blend of methodological investigation and
methodical close reading, Schur suggests that the Republic"
qualifies the authority of its conclusions by displaying a strong
countercurrent of ongoing movement."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!