0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Ancient Western philosophy to c 500

Buy Now

Levels of Argument - A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Hardcover) Loot Price: R2,713
Discovery Miles 27 130
Levels of Argument - A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Hardcover): Dominic...

Levels of Argument - A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Hardcover)

Dominic Scott

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R2,713 Discovery Miles 27 130 | Repayment Terms: R254 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

In Levels of Argument, Dominic Scott compares the Republic and Nicomachean Ethics from a methodological perspective. In the first half he argues that the Republic distinguishes between two levels of argument in the defence of justice, the 'longer' and 'shorter' routes. The longer is the ideal and aims at maximum precision, requiring knowledge of the Forms and a definition of the Good. The shorter route is less precise, employing hypotheses, analogies and empirical observation. This is the route that Socrates actually follows in the Republic, because it is appropriate to the level of his audience and can stand on its own feet as a plausible defence of justice. In the second half of the book, Scott turns to the Nicomachean Ethics. Scott argues that, even though Aristotle rejects a universal Form of the Good, he implicitly recognises the existence of longer and shorter routes, analogous to those distinguished in the Republic. The longer route would require a comprehensive theoretical worldview, incorporating elements from Aristotle's metaphysics, physics, psychology, and biology. But Aristotle steers his audience away from such an approach as being a distraction from the essentially practical goals of political science. Unnecessary for good decision-making, it is not even an ideal. In sum, Platonic and Aristotelian methodologies both converge and diverge. Both distinguish analogously similar levels of argument, and it is the shorter route that both philosophers actually follow-Plato because he thinks it will have to suffice, Aristotle because he thinks that there is no need to go beyond it.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United Kingdom
Release date: March 2015
Authors: Dominic Scott
Dimensions: 222 x 147 x 21mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 244
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-924964-0
Categories: Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Ancient Western philosophy to c 500 > General
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Ancient Western philosophy to c 500 > General
Promotions
LSN: 0-19-924964-4
Barcode: 9780199249640

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners