Books > History > American history
|
Buy Now
Presidential Elections and Majority Rule - The Rise, Demise, and Potential Restoration of the Jeffersonian Electoral College (Paperback)
Loot Price: R609
Discovery Miles 6 090
You Save: R279
(31%)
|
|
Presidential Elections and Majority Rule - The Rise, Demise, and Potential Restoration of the Jeffersonian Electoral College (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
A timely look into and argument for the Jeffersonian Electoral
College. The Electoral College that governs America has been with
us since 1804, when Thomas Jefferson's supporters redesigned it for
his re-election. The Jeffersonians were motivated by the principle
of majority rule. Gone were the days when a president would be
elected by acclamation, as George Washington had been. Instead,
given the emergence of intense two-party competition, the
Jeffersonians wanted to make sure that the Electoral College
awarded the presidency to the candidate of the majority, rather
than minority, party. They also envisioned that a candidate would
win by amassing a majority of Electoral College votes secured from
states where the candidate's party was in the majority. For most of
American history, this system has worked as intended, producing
presidents who won Electoral College victories derived from
state-based majorities. In the last quarter-century, however, there
have been three significant aberrations from the Jeffersonian
design: 1992, 2000, and 2016. In each of these years, the Electoral
College victory depended on states where the winner received only a
minority of votes. In this authoritative history of the American
Electoral College system, Edward Foley analyzes the consequences of
the unparalleled departure from the Jeffersonians' original
intent-and delineates what we can do about it. He explains how
states, by simply changing their Electoral College procedures,
could restore the original Jeffersonian commitment to majority
rule. There are various ways to do this, all of which comply with
the Constitution. If only a few states had done so before 2016, the
outcome might have been different. Doing so before future elections
can prevent another victory that, contrary to the original
Jeffersonian intent, a majority of voters did not want.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.