0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy

Buy Now

Debating Humanitarian Intervention - Should We Try to Save Strangers? (Hardcover) Loot Price: R4,953
Discovery Miles 49 530
Debating Humanitarian Intervention - Should We Try to Save Strangers? (Hardcover): Fernando Teson, Bas Van Der Vossen

Debating Humanitarian Intervention - Should We Try to Save Strangers? (Hardcover)

Fernando Teson, Bas Van Der Vossen

Series: Debating Ethics

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R4,953 Discovery Miles 49 530 | Repayment Terms: R464 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

When foreign powers attack civilians, other countries face an impossible dilemma. Two courses of action emerge: either to retaliate against an abusive government on behalf of its victims, or to remain spectators. Either course offers its own perils: the former, lost lives and resources without certainty of restoring peace or preventing worse problems from proliferating; the latter, cold spectatorship that leaves a country at the mercy of corrupt rulers or to revolution. Philosophers Fernando Teson and Bas van der Vossen offer contrasting views of humanitarian intervention, defining it as either war aimed at ending tyranny, or as violence. The authors employ the tools of impartial modern analytic philosophy, particularly just war theory, to substantiate their claims. According to Teson, a humanitarian intervention has the same just cause as a justified revolution: ending tyranny. He analyzes the different kinds of just cause and whether or not an intervener may pursue other justified causes. For Teson, the permissibility of humanitarian intervention is almost exclusively determined by the rules of proportionality. Bas van der Vossen, by contrast, holds that military intervention is morally impermissible in almost all cases. Justified interventions, Van der Vossen argues, must have high ex ante chance of success. Analyzing the history and prospects of intervention shows that they almost never do. Teson and van der Vossen refer to concrete cases, and weigh the consequences of continued or future intervention in Syria, Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Iraq, Lybia and Egypt. By placing two philosophers in dialogue, Debating Humanitarian Intervention is not constrained by a single, unifying solution to the exclusion of all others. Rather, it considers many conceivable actions as judged by analytic philosophy, leaving the reader equipped to make her own, informed judgments.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United States
Series: Debating Ethics
Release date: November 2017
Authors: Fernando Teson (Tobias Simon Eminent Scholar) • Bas Van Der Vossen (Assistant Professor)
Dimensions: 212 x 148 x 23mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 288
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-020290-3
Categories: Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
Books > Law > International law > Public international law > International humanitarian law
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > General
Books > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
Promotions
LSN: 0-19-020290-4
Barcode: 9780190202903

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners