Shell shock achieved a very high political profile in the years
1919-1922. Publications ranging from John Bull to the Morning Post
insisted that shell-shocked men should be treated with respect, and
the Minister for Health announced that the government was committed
to protecting shell-shocked men from the stigma of lunacy. Yet at
the same time, many mentally-wounded veterans were struggling with
a pension system which was failing to give them security. It is
this conflict between the political rhetoric and the lived
experience of many wounded veterans that explains why the
government was unable to dispel the negative wartime assessment of
official shell-shock treatment. There was also a real conflict
between the government's wish to forget shell shock whilst
memorialising the war and remembering the war dead. As a result of
these contradictions, shell shock was not forgotten, on the
contrary, the shell-shocked soldier quickly grew to symbolise the
confusions and inconsistencies of the Great War.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!