During the 1930s, a battle was waged over both philosophy and
policy between those who described themselves as liberals, both
inside and outside the Roosevelt administration. On one side were
those who viewed themselves as modern liberals, who saw capitalism
as a failure and sought to replace it with a collectivist society
and economy. On the other were more traditional American liberals
or progressives who aimed merely to reform capitalism, in the
belief that individual liberty and a free economy were synonymous.
This study examines the role of each during this vital decade.
Instead of reaching its high point in the New Deal years, Best
argues, American liberalism retreated from most of its major tenets
as a result of the popularity of collectivism.
Challenging existing stereotypes and conventional wisdom
concerning the 1930s, this study delves into the controversy
between the new liberals and the free enterprise group. Included in
this latter category were the Brandeisians, who exercised
considerable influence within the Roosevelt administration, as well
as a variety of more traditional liberals who worked through other
channels to achieve their goals. Many of those who called
themselves liberals in the 1930s had, Best contends, actually
abandoned their basic liberal tenets. This included the president
as well.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!