Since at least the time of Tocqueville, observers have noted
that Americans draw on the language of rights when expressing
dissatisfaction with political and social conditions. As the United
States confronts a complicated set of twenty-first-century
problems, that tradition continues, with Americans invoking
symbolic events of the founding era to frame calls for change. Most
observers have been critical of such "rights talk." Scholars on the
left worry that it limits the range of political demands to those
that can be articulated as legally recognized rights, while
conservatives fear that it creates unrealistic expectations of
entitlement. Drawing on a remarkable cache of Depression-era
complaint letters written by ordinary Americans to the Justice
Department, George I. Lovell challenges these common claims.
Although the letters were written prior to the emergence of the
modern civil rights movement--which most people assume is the
origin of rights talk--many contain novel legal arguments,
including expansive demands for new entitlements that went beyond
what authorities had regarded as legitimate or required by law.
Lovell demonstrates that rights talk is more malleable and less
constraining than is generally believed. Americans, he shows, are
capable of deploying idealized legal claims as a rhetorical tool
for expressing their aspirations for a more just society while
retaining a realistic understanding that the law often falls short
of its own ideals.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!