During the 1992 presidential campaign, health care reform became
a hot issue, paving the way for one of the most important yet
ill-fated social policy initiatives in American history: Bill
Clinton's 1993 proposal for comprehensive coverage under "managed
competition." Here Jacob Hacker not only investigates for the first
time how managed competition became the president's reform
framework, but also illuminates how issues and policies emerge. He
follows Clinton's policy ideas from their initial formulation by
policy experts through their endorsement by medical industry
leaders and politicians to their inclusion--in a new and unexpected
form--in the proposal itself. Throughout he explores key questions:
Why did health reform become a national issue in the 1990s? Why did
Clinton choose managed competition over more familiar options
during the 1992 presidential campaign? What effect did this have on
the fate of his proposal?
Drawing on records of the President's task force, interviews
with a wide range of key policy players, and many other sources,
Hacker locates his analysis within the context of current political
theories on agenda setting. He concludes that Clinton chose managed
competition partly because advocates inside and outside the
campaign convinced him that it represented a unique middle road to
health care reform. This conviction, Hacker maintains, blinded the
president and his allies to the political risks of the approach and
hindered the development of an effective strategy for enacting
it.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!