The scientific evidence does not support the notion that TV and
film violence cause aggression in children or in anyone else. So
argues Jonathan Freedman, based on his findings that far fewer than
half of the scientific studies have found a causal connection
between exposure to media violence and aggression or crime. In
fact, Freedman believes that, taken to a more controversial
extreme, the research could be interpreted as showing that there is
no causal effect of media violence at all.
"Media Violence and its Effect on Aggression" offers a
provocative challenge to the accepted norms in media studies and
psychology. Freedman begins with a comprehensive review of all the
research on the effect of violent movies and television on
aggression and crime. Having shown the lack of scientific support
for the prevailing belief that media violence is connected to
violent behaviour, he then explains why something that seems so
intuitive and even obvious might be incorrect and goes on to
provide plausible reasons why media violence might not have bad
effects on children. He contrasts the supposed effects of TV
violence on crime with the known effects of poverty and other
social factors, and discusses the difference between television
advertising, which, he argues, does have an effect, and violent
programs, which do not.
Freedman concludes by noting that in recent years television and
films have been as violent as ever and violent video games have
become more and more popular, yet during this period there has been
a dramatic "decrease" in violent crime. He argues that this makes
it highly implausible that media violence causes aggression or
crime.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!