Books > Computing & IT > Applications of computing > Image processing
|
Buy Now
Multiple Classifier Systems - First International Workshop, MCS 2000 Cagliari, Italy, June 21-23, 2000 Proceedings (Paperback, 2000 ed.)
Loot Price: R1,690
Discovery Miles 16 900
|
|
Multiple Classifier Systems - First International Workshop, MCS 2000 Cagliari, Italy, June 21-23, 2000 Proceedings (Paperback, 2000 ed.)
Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1857
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Many theoretical and experimental studies have shown that a
multiple classi?er system is an e?ective technique for reducing
prediction errors [9,10,11,20,19]. These studies identify mainly
three elements that characterize a set of cl- si?ers:
-Therepresentationoftheinput(whateachindividualclassi?erreceivesby
wayofinput).
-Thearchitectureoftheindividualclassi?ers(algorithmsandparametri-
tion). - The way to cause these classi?ers to take a decision
together.
Itcanbeassumedthatacombinationmethodise?cientifeachindividualcl-
si?ermakeserrors'inadi?erentway',sothatitcanbeexpectedthatmostofthe
classi?ers can correct the mistakes that an individual one does
[1,19]. The term 'weak classi?ers' refers to classi?ers whose
capacity has been reduced in some way so as to increase their
prediction diversity. Either their internal architecture
issimple(e.g.,theyusemono-layerperceptronsinsteadofmoresophisticated
neural networks), or they are prevented from using all the
information available.
Sinceeachclassi?erseesdi?erentsectionsofthelearningset,theerrorcorre-
tion among them is reduced. It has been shown that the majority
vote is the
beststrategyiftheerrorsamongtheclassi?ersarenotcorrelated.Moreover,
in real applications, the majority vote also appears to be as e?
cient as more sophisticated decision rules [2,13].
Onemethodofgeneratingadiversesetofclassi?ersistoupsetsomeaspect
ofthetraininginputofwhichtheclassi?erisrather unstable. In the
present
paper,westudytwodistinctwaystocreatesuchweakenedclassi?ers;i.e.learning
set resampling (using the 'Bagging' approach [5]), and random
feature subset selection (using 'MFS', a Multiple Feature Subsets
approach [3]). Other recent and similar techniques are not
discussed here but are also based on modi?cations to the training
and/or the feature set [7,8,12,21].
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|