Rapid social change requires that major institutions adapt.
Management professionals who are called in to help presumably know
what to do, but in fact their typical ways of working are
anachronistic. Many professionals tacitly assume stability and a
level of knowledge that no longer exists. They devise change
programs that, while consistent with cultural expectations and
professional standards, are flawed from the start and may actually
reduce institutional capacity to adapt. Their practices and culture
were developed for a different time and are ill-suited to fluid and
highly interconnected situations. The very people who are relied
upon for adaptive solutions are preventing what they should be
providing.
Weaknesses of four familiar patterns of professional thinking
are reviewed. Each puts society at risk:
- a rational pattern locks in optimal solutions that rapidly
become obsolete
- a focused pattern is blind to reconfiguration options and the
influence of external relationships
- a principled pattern fails to apprehend and develop the unique
opportunities of a situation
- a interested pattern undercuts common interests that are
already imperiled
An ominous feature of these at-risk patterns is the lack of
awareness of limitations or of how the professional is included
within the problematic situations to be addressed.
A different pattern is described - "reflexive practice" - that
takes turbulence seriously and does not make convenient,
traditional, and incorrect assumptions about stability, certainty,
and the capacity of the professional for insight, foresight, and
separation from the problem. These practitioners promote adaptive
strategies appropriate for turbulent situations. Distinguishing
features of these strategies include rapid generation and pruning
of options, building capacity and readiness for continuous
modification and reconfiguration, a greater comprehension of
external changes, and reliance on mutual interaction through
networks across boundaries.
Examples of reflexive practice, and the contrasting failures of
at-risk practices, are traced through domains where the need for
adaptation is acute - in national security, economics, energy, and
environment. Personal characteristics and education of the
reflexive practitioner are examined in greater detail. A simple
survey of guests on C-SPAN illustrates the prevalence of the
various types and their difference.
Reflexive practice is the most appropriate pattern for thinking
and action for management professionals under current conditions,
and in particular when devising responses to global threats. The
thinking pattern remains fallible, however, and will often violate
standards and appear weak in comparison with other types. This
condition will persist until professional cultures themselves
become adapted to the times.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!