Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are
no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision
makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in
deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical
reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book
addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions
determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the
popular view that legal decision makers practice special forms of
reasoning is false.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!