The so-called Phony War from September 1939 to May 1940 occupies
a peculiar yet distinct place in popular memory. All the sensations
of war, except the fighting, were present; yet, instead of massed
air attacks and great land battles, very little happened. The
British government was said to be complacent, and the people
downright bored. Then, France fell to German attack, and the small
British army was evacuated (minus its equipment) from Dunkirk.
Reaction to this major strategic catastrophe was naturally to blame
the men deemed guilty for bringing the nation to the verge of
humiliating defeat. In sharp contrast to previous studies, Smart
argues that there was more to the phony war than governmental
complacency, that the period was more than a foolish or frivolous
ante-chamber to a later more heroic phase.
The extent to which the "guilty men" verdict on the first nine
months of Britain's Second World War has stuck remains surprising.
The notion that the phony war was a necessary, indeed
over-determined, prelude to catastrophe has become cemented over
time. Examining the workings of the Anglo-French leadership during
this period, Smart picks this thesis apart and argues that disaster
was not necessarily, still less inevitably, just around the corner.
He concludes that Anglo-French decision-making during this time was
basically sound, that the soldiers were well equipped and in
good-heart, and that there was no malaise eating away at the
entente. This study offers a challenging reappraisal of the phony
war from a British perspective.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!