|
Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Media studies
|
Buy Now
Spinning Coverage - An Analysis of The New York Times' Reporting on the War in Iraq in Light of the U.S. Administration's Spin and Propaganda Efforts (Paperback)
Loot Price: R1,536
Discovery Miles 15 360
|
|
|
Spinning Coverage - An Analysis of The New York Times' Reporting on the War in Iraq in Light of the U.S. Administration's Spin and Propaganda Efforts (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 18 - 22 working days
|
Diploma Thesis from the year 2008 in the subject Communications -
Media and Politics, Politic Communications, grade: 1,0, University
of Applied Sciences Osnabruck, course: Kommunikationsmanagement,
language: English, abstract: The ongoing war in Iraq was
precipitated by a flurry of spin and propaganda originating from
the White House. In September 2002, the U.S. administration kicked
off a communication campaign almost unprecedented in its
dimensions, in order to convince Congress and the public of a
military strike in Iraq; a campaign so skillfully woven that a huge
part of the U.S. media industry seemed to forget its
'watchdog'-role and went out of its way to surpass the others in
patriotism, critical coverage be damned. In early 2003, however,
many of Washington's claims and assertions were slowly beginning to
get publicly questioned or downright proven wrong by experts and
the media, especially when no weapons of mass destruction were
found in Iraq after extensive searches. A question surfaced that
had not been explicitly asked in the months before the war: the
question whether the administration might have misled the American
people into war by exaggerating the threat Saddam Hussein posed to
the world and, in order to do so, might even have manipulated
evidence. However, a question just as important is, whether the
American media lost sight of its obligations in the run-up to war,
and by temporarily neglecting its standards of objectivity and
neutrality gave the U.S. administration the platform it needed to
actually convince the public of the necessity of military action.
This paper's primary hypothesis will be that not even a critically
acclaimed newspaper like The New York Times was able to evade the
White House's spin and propaganda, but that the coverage got more
critical as time went by, even though there was little public
self-reflection on behalf of the journalists and editors. To
analyze a possible shift in attitude and reporting, edit
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.