Although events in East Asia were a sideshow in the great drama
of World War I, what happened there shattered the accord between
Japan and the United States. This book pursues the two-fold
question of how and why U.S.-Japanese tensions developed into
antagonism during the war by inquiring into the historical sources
of both sides. Kawamura explains this complex phenomenon by looking
at various factors: conflicts of national interests--geopolitical
and economic; perceptual problems such as miscommunication,
miscalculation, and mistrust; and, most important of all,
incompatible approaches to foreign policy. America's universalism
and the unilateralism inherent in Wilsonian idealistic
internationalism clashed with Japan's particularistic regionalism
and the pluralism that derived from its strong sense of racial
identity and anti-Western nationalistic sentiments.
By looking at the motives and circumstances behind Japan's
expansionist policy in East Asia, Kawamura suggests some of the
centrifugal forces that divided the nations and challenged the
premise of Wilsonian internationalism. At the same time, through
critical examination of the Wilson administration's universalist
and unilateral response to Japan's actions, she raises serious
questions about the effectiveness of American foreign policy. At
the close of the 20th century, after 50 years of Cold War, those in
search of a new world order tend to resort to Wilsonian rhetoric.
This book suggests that it can be unwise to apply a universalistic
and idealistic approach to international conflicts that often
result from extreme nationalism, regionalism, and racial
rivalry.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!