Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Social & political philosophy
|
Buy Now
The Argument from Injustice - A Reply to Legal Positivism (Paperback)
Loot Price: R1,102
Discovery Miles 11 020
|
|
The Argument from Injustice - A Reply to Legal Positivism (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and
morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the
separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently
of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there
are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and
morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral
elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone
is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection
between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to
address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a
nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua
comprehensive theory of law.
The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five
distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a
multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the
enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context,
it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak
solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however,
is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that
necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is
the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for
the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The
participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's
formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing
of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a
concept of law that systematically links classical elements of
legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy -
with the desideratum of nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness
of content.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.