Politicians and opinion leaders on both sides of the Mason-Dixon
line struggled to formulate coherent responses to the secession of
the deep South states. The Confederate attack on Fort Sumter in
mid-April 1861 triggered civil war and the loss of four upper South
states from the Union. The essays by three senior historians in
"Secession Winter" explore the robust debates that preceded these
events.
For five months in the winter of 1860-1861, Americans did not
know for certain that civil war was upon them. Some hoped for a
compromise; others wanted a fight. Many struggled to understand
what was happening to their country. Robert J. Cook, William L.
Barney, and Elizabeth R. Varon take approaches to this period that
combine political, economic, and social-cultural lines of analysis.
Rather than focus on whether civil war was inevitable, they look at
the political process of secession and find multiple internal
divisions--political parties, whites and nonwhites, elites and
masses, men and women. Even individual northerners and southerners
suffered inner conflicts.
The authors include the voices of Unionists and Whig party
moderates who had much to lose and upcountry folk who owned no
slaves and did not particularly like those who did. Barney contends
that white southerners were driven to secede by anxiety and guilt
over slavery. Varon takes a new look at Robert E. Lee's decision to
join the Confederacy. Cook argues that both northern and southern
politicians claimed the rightness of their cause by constructing
selective narratives of historical grievances.
"Secession Winter" explores the fact of contingency and reminds
readers and students that nothing was foreordained.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!