Sooner or later, if the world keeps following its current
course, there will be a nuclear war. Roger Hilsman, who played a
significant role during the Cuban Missile Crisis, is convinced that
the only way to prevent an eventual nuclear conflict is to abolish
war itself. This study examines and critiques all of the various
proposals to date for incorporating nuclear weapons into strategic
doctrine and concludes that these efforts have failed. Plans for
abolishing only nuclear weapons are, according to Hilsman,
good-intentioned but ill-advised attempts to rehabilitate war.
Instead, he proposes a gradual transition to world government,
which will perform the traditional social and political functions
that were in the past served only by war.
War will not disappear immediately. The world must still be
prepared to deal with three types of war: wars that have the
potential for escalating to a nuclear World War III; wars that are
self-confining; and civil wars that cry out for peacekeeping
intervention on humanitarian grounds. While the United States will
have to be responsible for dealing with potentially nuclear wars,
an entirely new force structure will be necessary. Self-confining
wars, such as Bosnia, pose a particular problem as far as world
public opinion for intervention is concerned; this study proposes
solutions to such dilemmas. Finally, because national forces are
ill-suited to peacekeeping missions in countries ravaged by civil
war, the UN must recruit and maintain an international force along
the lines of the French Foreign Legion.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!