By September 1944, Allied forces had broken out from the
Normandy beachheads, liberated Paris, and found themselves poised
on the German border. As this offensive gained momentum, Patton and
Montgomery, hoping to exploit the enemy's temporary weakness in the
West, concocted their own alternatives to Eisenhower's broad front
strategy. Each proposed a single thrust aimed directly into the
German heartland, designed to bring the troops home by Christmas.
This study examines this so-called broad front-single thrust
controversy and concludes that the idea of early victory was
wishful thinking--a product of the erroneous and dangerous
assumption that the Nazi regime was already tottering on the brink
of collapse.
Precisely because of its lightning pace, the Allied advance
resulted in severe logistical problems, limiting Patton's proposed
operation to only ten combat divisions, while Montgomery's closer
proximity to the coast might have allowed for as many as sixteen.
But it should have been obvious that either thrust faced certain
destruction against the 250 divisions still fielded by the
Wehrmacht on all fronts in September. In light of this substantial
German military capacity, despite serious losses and strategic
setbacks, the single thrust could not have been a decisive
war-ending maneuver. In fact, Andidora argues, it could not even
have provided for its own security against the forces that would
have coalesced against it. Rather than unnecessarily prolonging the
war, as some have argued, Eisenhower's decision to stay the
strategic course probably averted a military disaster.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!