Some people make photo albums, collect antiques, or visit
historic battlefields. Others keep diaries, plan annual family
gatherings, or stitch together patchwork quilts in a tradition
learned from grandparents. Each of us has ways of communing with
the past, and our reasons for doing so are as varied as our
memories. In a sweeping survey, Roy Rosenzweig and David Thelen
asked 1,500 Americans about their connection to the past and how it
influences their daily lives and hopes for the future. The result
is a surprisingly candid series of conversations and reflections on
how the past infuses the present with meaning.
Rosenzweig and Thelen found that people assemble their
experiences into narratives that allow them to make sense of their
personal histories, set priorities, project what might happen next,
and try to shape the future. By using these narratives to mark
change and create continuity, people chart the courses of their
lives. A young woman from Ohio speaks of giving birth to her first
child, which caused her to reflect upon her parents and the ways
that their example would help her to become a good mother. An
African American man from Georgia tells how he and his wife were
drawn to each other by their shared experiences and lessons learned
from growing up in the South in the 1950s. Others reveal how they
personalize historical events, as in the case of a Massachusetts
woman who traces much of her guarded attitude toward life to
witnessing the assassination of John F. Kennedy on television when
she was a child.
While the past is omnipresent to Americans, "history" as it is
usually defined in textbooks leaves many people cold. Rosenzweig
and Thelen found that history as taught in school does not inspire
a strong connection to the past. And they reveal how race and
ethnicity affects how Americans perceive the past: while most white
Americans tend to think of it as something personal, African
Americans and American Indians are more likely to think in terms of
broadly shared experiences--like slavery, the Civil Rights
Movement, and the violation of Indian treaties."
Rosenzweig and Thelen's conclusions about the ways people use
their personal, family, and national stories have profound
implications for anyone involved in researching or presenting
history, as well as for all those who struggle to engage with the
past in a meaningful way.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!