Taking the title of his book from Isaiah Berlin's famous essay
distinguishing a negative concept of liberty connoting lack of
interference by others from a positive concept involving
participation in the political realm, Samuel Fleischacker explores
a third definition of liberty that lies between the first two. In
Fleischacker's view, Kant and Adam Smith think of liberty as a
matter of acting on our capacity for judgment, thereby differing
both from those who tie it to the satisfaction of our desires and
those who translate it as action in accordance with reason or
"will." Integrating the thought of Kant and Smith, and developing
his own stand through readings of the "Critique of Judgment" and
"The Wealth of Nations, " Fleischacker shows how different acting
on one's best judgment is from acting on one's desires--how, in
particular, good judgment, as opposed to mere desire, can flourish
only in favorable social and political conditions. At the same
time, exercising judgment is something every individual must do for
him- or herself, hence not something that philosophers and
politicians who reason better than the rest of us can do in our
stead.
For this reason advocates of a liberty based on judgment are
likely to be more concerned than are libertarians to make sure that
government provides people with conditions for the use of their
liberty--for example, excellent standards of education, health
care, and unemployment insurance--while at the same time promoting
a less paternalistic view of government than most of the movements
associated for the past thirty years with the political left.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!