A major study of John Wesley's political ethics and an attempt
to reformulate a Wesleyan orientation to political thinking by
drawing the political implications of Wesley's "order of
salvation."
Was John Wesley the "fanatical Tory" conservative of many
political portraits, with his loyalty to the British monarchy, his
support of taxation without representation, and his severe
criticism of American independence? Or was he an emergent political
liberal, condemning slavery, defending the rights and liberties of
the British people, and urging government intervention in the
economy to relieve hunger and poverty? This historical and
theological study of Wesley's political thought concludes that he
is understood best neither as Tory nor as liberal (both of which he
was, in important respects), but as a staunch champion of limited
constitutional government and of the subordination of power to
law--in the context of the "Glorious Revolution" and the organic
unity of the British community. Wesley's understanding of rights is
a mixture of the historical and the natural, but is closer to the
adaptive conservatism of Edmund Burke than to natural rights
individualism in the following of John Locke.
Weber argues further that Wesley's deliberate exclusion of the
people from politics can be challenged from within his own theology
by recovering and developing his concept of the political image and
integrating it with his understanding of the order of salvation.
This process of recovery and integration discloses the political
vocation for all humankind and opens the way to an authentically
Wesleyan political language. It has significant implications also
for rethinking Wesley's theology as such, and not only the Wesleyan
language of politics.
This book addresses the apparent conflict between Wesley's own
political stance and his proclamation of an inclusive gospel ("free
grace to all."). It focuses on the "order of salvation" and a
reorientation of Wesley's approach to the Trinity. It includes an
historical exploration of Wesley's political context and
commitments. It opens the possibility of an authentically Wesleyan
political ethic and shows how diverse views within the Methodist
tradition might be reconciled through a recasting of Wesleyan
theology. It will help students to see how Wesley's contribution to
the realm of ethics might not be negated by his own authoritarian
and patriarchal political commitments.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!