Books > History > World history > 1750 to 1900
|
Buy Now
The War within the Union High Command - Politics and Generalship during the Civil War (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R1,547
Discovery Miles 15 470
|
|
The War within the Union High Command - Politics and Generalship during the Civil War (Hardcover, New)
Series: Modern War Studies
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
With Union armies poised to launch the final campaigns against the
Confederacy in 1864, three of its five commanders were "political
generals"--appointed officers with little or no military training.
Army chief of staff Henry Halleck thought such generals jeopardized
the lives of men under their command and he and his peers held them
in utter contempt. Historians have largely followed suit. Thomas
Goss, however, offers a new and more positive assessment of the
leadership qualities of these Northern commanders. In the process,
he cuts through the stereotypes of political generals as
superfluous and largely inept tacticians, ambitious schemers, and
military failures. Goss examines the reasons why the selection
process yielded so many generals who lacked military backgrounds an
explores the tense and often bitter relationships among political
and professional officers to illuminate the dynamics of Union
generalship during the war. As this book reveals, professional
generals viewed the war as a military problem requiring
battle-field solutions, while appointees (and President Lincoln)
focused more emphatically on the broader political contours of the
struggle. The resulting friction often eroded Northern morale and
damaged the North's war effort. Goss challenges the traditional
idea that success was measured only on the battle-field by
demonstrating significant links between military success and the
achievement of the Union's political objectives. Examining
commanders like Benjamin Butler, Nathaniel Banks, John McClernand,
John Fremont, and Franz Sigel, Goss shows how many filled vital
functions by raising troops, boosting homefront morale, securing
national support for the war--andsometimes even achieving
significant success on the battlefield. Comparing these generals
with their professional counterparts reveals that all had vital
roles to play in helping Lincoln prosecute the war and that West
Pointers, despite their military training, were not necessarily
better prepared for waging war. Whether professional or appointed,
Goss reminds us, all generals could be considered political
inasmuch as war is a continuation of politics by other means. He
shows us that far more was asked of Union commanders than to simply
win battles and in so doing urges a new appreciation of those
appointed leaders who were thrust into the maelstrom of the Civil
War.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.