Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political activism > Terrorism, freedom fighters, armed struggle
|
Buy Now
How Terrorism is Wrong - Morality and Political Violence (Paperback)
Loot Price: R942
Discovery Miles 9 420
|
|
How Terrorism is Wrong - Morality and Political Violence (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 12 - 19 working days
|
What is terrorism? How is it different from other kinds of
political violence? Why exactly is it wrong? Why is war often
thought capable of being justified? On what grounds should we judge
when the use of violence is morally acceptable? It is often thought
that using violence to uphold and enforce the rule of law can be
justified, that violence used in self-defense is acceptable, and
that some liberation movements can be excused for using
violence--but that terrorism is always wrong. How persuasive are
these arguments, and on what bases should we judge them?
How Terrorism is Wrong collects articles by Virginia Held along
with much new material. It offers a moral assessment of various
forms of political violence, with terrorism the focus of much of
the discussion. Here and throughout, Held examines possible causes
discussed, including the connection between terrorism and
humiliation. Held also considers military intervention,
conventional war, intervention to protect human rights, violence to
prevent political change, and the status and requirements of
international law. She looks at the cases of Rwanda, Kosovo, Iraq,
and the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Finally, she explores
questions of who has legitimate authority to engage in justifiable
uses of violence, whether groups can be responsible for ethnic
violence, and how the media should cover terrorism.
Held discusses appropriate ways of engaging in moral evaluation and
improving our moral recommendations concerning the uses of
violence. Just war theory has been developed for violence between
the military forces of conflicting states, but much contemporary
political violence is not of this kind. Held considers the guidance
offered by such traditional moral theories as Kantian ethics and
utilitarianism, and also examines what the newer approach of the
ethics of care can contribute to our evaluations of violence. Care
is obviously antithetical to violence since violence destroys what
care takes pains to build; but the ethics of care recognizes that
violence is not likely to disappear from human affairs, and can
offer realistic understandings of how best to reduce it.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.