Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure
|
Buy Now
Choctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar (Paperback, Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1986)
Loot Price: R2,776
Discovery Miles 27 760
|
|
Choctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar (Paperback, Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1986)
Series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Donate to Against Period Poverty
Total price: R2,786
Discovery Miles: 27 860
|
The Choctaw language, indigenous to the southeastern United States,
now with its greatest concentrations ofspeakers in Missis sippi,
Oklahoma, and Los Angeles, has in the main escaped the
scrutinyoftheoreticallinguistics.ItisnotthatChoctaw isanintrin
sicallyuninterestinglanguage- aquickglanceataclausewithfive
agreement controllers and a mismatch between the caseofafree
standingnominaland its agreement affix should dispelthat notion.
Rather it is, I think, the question of what we can learn from a
languageinwhichNPsdon'tmovearound,"WHs"don'tfront, and gaps simply
arise from pronominalization. My hope is that the presentvolume,
takentogetherwithagrowingliteraturespurredon by the workofPamMunro
and her students atUCLA, will bring Choctawintothelightofdayand
into the circleoflanguagescon sidered when constructing theories
that define "possible human language." Thepresentstudy,
arevisionofmy 1981dissertation(University ofCalifornia, SanDiego),
focusesfirstandforemostontheChoctaw agreementsystem,
takingthisasthekeytothestructureofChoctaw syntax. The immediate
goal, then, is to provide a unified account ofthestructures and
rules underlyingtheagreement system.Along the way a
rangeofgrammatical phenomena is examined, taken as evidence for
particular structural configurations, and incorporated into
awell-integratedaccountofmorphologicaland syntacticfacts. The
resultsbearon anumber ofcurrent issues, includingthe Un accusative
Hypothesis, the existence of demotions, the nature of antipassive,
disjunctive rule application, universals of causative
constructions, and others.For these reasons Choctawdeserves the
scrutinyoftheoreticians. The data forming the corpus for analysis
represent a variety of Oklahoma Choctaw.They were collected from a
nativespeaker in San Diego between 1978 and 1982 and from various
speakers in Oklahoma during two extended visits to Broken Bow in
1980. I lX PREFACE x
wishtothankthespeakerswhohelpedmebysharingtheirlanguage
andencouragingmystudies.MyworkonChoctawwassupportedin
partbyfundsfrom theNationalScienceFoundation(throughgrant
numberBNS78-17498totheUniversityofCalifornia, SanDiego),
theAmericanPhilosophicalSociety(throughaPhillipsFundgrant),
andtheDepartmentofLinguisticsatUCSD."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.