|
Showing 1 - 8 of
8 matches in All Departments
Priscian of Lydia was one of the Athenian philosophers who took
refuge in 531 AD with King Khosroes I of Persia, after the
Christian Emperor Justinian stopped the teaching of the pagan
Neoplatonist school in Athens. This was one of the earliest
examples of the sixth-century diffusion of the philosophy of the
commentators to other cultures. Tantalisingly, Priscian fully
recorded in Greek the answers provided by the Athenian philosophers
to the king's questions on philosophy and science. But these
answers survive only in a later Latin translation which understood
both the Greek and the subject matter very poorly. Our translators
have often had to reconstruct from the Latin what the Greek would
have been, in order to recover the original sense. The answers
start with subjects close to the Athenians' hearts: the human soul,
on which Priscian was an expert, and sleep and visions. But their
interest may have diminished when the king sought their expertise
on matters of physical science: the seasons, celestial zones,
medical effects of heat and cold, the tides, displacement of the
four elements, the effect of regions on living things, why only
reptiles are poisonous, and winds. At any rate, in 532 AD, they
moved on from the palace, but still under Khosroes' protection.
This is the first translation of the record they left into English
or any modern language. This English translation is accompanied by
an introduction and comprehensive commentary notes, which clarify
and discuss the meaning and implications of the original
philosophy. Part of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle series,
the edition makes this philosophical work accessible to a modern
readership and includes additional scholarly apparatus such as a
bibliography, glossary of translated terms and a subject index.
50 years before Philoponus, two Christians from Gaza, seeking to
influence Alexandrian Christians, defended the Christian belief in
resurrection and the finite duration of the world, and attacked
rival Neoplatonist views. Aeneas addresses an unusual version of
the food chain argument against resurrection, that our bodies will
get eaten by other creatures. Zacharias attacks the Platonist
examples of synchronous creation, which were the production of
light, of shadow, and of a footprint in the sand. A fragment
survives of a third Gazan contribution by Procopius. Zacharias
lampoons the Neoplatonist professor in Alexandria, Ammonius, and
claims a leading role in the riot which led to the cleverest
Neoplatonist, Damascius, fleeing to Athens. It was only Philoponus,
however, who was able to embarrass the Neoplatonists by arguing
against them on their own terms. This volume contains an English
translation of the works by Aeneas of Gaza and Zacharias of
Mytilene, accompanied by a detailed introduction, explanatory notes
and a bibliography.
Plutarch's essay 'How to Study Poetry' offers a set of reading
practices intended to remove the potential damage that poetry can
do to the moral health of young readers. It opens a window on to a
world of ancient education and scholarship which can seem rather
alien to those brought up in the highly sophisticated world of
modern literary theory and criticism. The full Introduction and
Commentary, by two of the world's leading scholars in the field,
trace the origins and intellectual affiliations of Plutarch's
method and fully illustrate the background to each of his examples.
As such this book may serve as an introduction to the whole subject
of ancient reading practices and literary criticism. The Commentary
also pays particular attention to grammar, syntax and style, and
sets this essay within the context of Plutarch's thought and
writing more generally.
Plutarch's essay 'How to Study Poetry' offers a set of reading
practices intended to remove the potential damage that poetry can
do to the moral health of young readers. It opens a window on to a
world of ancient education and scholarship which can seem rather
alien to those brought up in the highly sophisticated world of
modern literary theory and criticism. The full Introduction and
Commentary, by two of the world's leading scholars in the field,
trace the origins and intellectual affiliations of Plutarch's
method and fully illustrate the background to each of his examples.
As such this book may serve as an introduction to the whole subject
of ancient reading practices and literary criticism. The Commentary
also pays particular attention to grammar, syntax and style, and
sets this essay within the context of Plutarch's thought and
writing more generally.
Priscian of Lydia was one of the Athenian philosophers who took
refuge in 531 AD with King Khosroes I of Persia, after the
Christian Emperor Justinian stopped the teaching of the pagan
Neoplatonist school in Athens. This was one of the earliest
examples of the sixth-century diffusion of the philosophy of the
commentators to other cultures. Tantalisingly, Priscian fully
recorded in Greek the answers provided by the Athenian philosophers
to the king's questions on philosophy and science. But these
answers survive only in a later Latin translation which understood
both the Greek and the subject matter very poorly. Our translators
have often had to reconstruct from the Latin what the Greek would
have been, in order to recover the original sense. The answers
start with subjects close to the Athenians' hearts: the human soul,
on which Priscian was an expert, and sleep and visions. But their
interest may have diminished when the king sought their expertise
on matters of physical science: the seasons, celestial zones,
medical effects of heat and cold, the tides, displacement of the
four elements, the effect of regions on living things, why only
reptiles are poisonous, and winds. At any rate, in 532 AD, they
moved on from the palace, but still under Khosroes' protection.
This is the first translation of the record they left into English
or any modern language. This English translation is accompanied by
an introduction and comprehensive commentary notes, which clarify
and discuss the meaning and implications of the original
philosophy. Part of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle series,
the edition makes this philosophical work accessible to a modern
readership and includes additional scholarly apparatus such as a
bibliography, glossary of translated terms and a subject index.
Alphabetical reading is designed for spelling, reading and
identifying letters in their proper order. Pictures are used to
illustrate and aid each word and its meaning. Colorful pages can be
used to add to the learning process. For more information on
Idealtec Products, write or send to SASE (Self stamped sealed
envelope) to Hometec Publishing, 185 Scottsdale Drive, Sparta, GA
31087-3903.
50 years before Philoponus, two Christians from Gaza, seeking to
influence Alexandrian Christians, defended the Christian belief in
resurrection and the finite duration of the world, and attacked
rival Neoplatonist views. Aeneas addresses an unusual version of
the food chain argument against resurrection, that our bodies will
get eaten by other creatures. Zacharias attacks the Platonist
examples of synchronous creation, which were the production of
light, of shadow, and of a footprint in the sand. A fragment
survives of a third Gazan contribution by Procopius. Zacharias
lampoons the Neoplatonist professor in Alexandria, Ammonius, and
claims a leading role in the riot which led to the cleverest
Neoplatonist, Damascius, fleeing to Athens. It was only Philoponus,
however, who was able to embarrass the Neoplatonists by arguing
against them on their own terms. This volume contains an English
translation of the works by Aeneas of Gaza and Zacharias of
Mytilene, accompanied by a detailed introduction, explanatory notes
and a bibliography.
|
|