|
Showing 1 - 9 of
9 matches in All Departments
A cutting-edge view of the digital humanities at a time of global
pandemic, catastrophe, and uncertainty Where do the digital
humanities stand in 2023? Debates in the Digital Humanities 2023
presents a state-of-the-field vision of digital humanities amid
rising social, political, economic, and environmental crises; a
global pandemic; and the deepening of austerity regimes in U.S.
higher education. Providing a look not just at where DH stands but
also where it is going, this fourth volume in the Debates in the
Digital Humanities series features both established scholars and
emerging voices pushing the field’s boundaries, asking thorny
questions, and providing space for practitioners to bring to the
fore their research and their hopes for future directions in the
field. Carrying forward the themes of political and social
engagement present in the series throughout, it includes crucial
contributions to the field—from a vital forum centered on the
voices of Black women scholars, manifestos from feminist and Latinx
perspectives on data and DH, and a consideration of Indigenous data
and artificial intelligence, to essays that range across topics
such as the relation of DH to critical race theory, capital, and
accessibility. Contributors: Harmony Bench, Ohio State U; Christina
Boyles, Michigan State U; Megan R. Brett, George Mason U; Michelle
Lee Brown, Washington State U; Patrick J. Burns, New York U; Kent
K. Chang, U of California, Berkeley; Rico Devara Chapman, Clark
Atlanta U; Marika Cifor, U of Washington; María Eugenia Cotera, U
of Texas; T. L. Cowan, U of Toronto; Marlene L. Daut, U of
Virginia; Quinn Dombrowski, Stanford U; Kate Elswit, U of London;
Nishani Frazier, U of Kansas; Kim Gallon, Brown U; Patricia Garcia,
U of Michigan; Lorena Gauthereau, U of Houston; Masoud
Ghorbaninejad, University of Victoria; Abraham Gibson, U of Texas
at San Antonio; Nathan P. Gibson, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität,
Munich; Kaiama L. Glover, Barnard College; Hilary N. Green,
Davidson College; Jo Guldi, Southern Methodist U; Matthew N.
Hannah, Purdue U Libraries; Jeanelle Horcasitas, DigitalOcean;
Christy Hyman, Mississippi State U; Arun Jacob, U of Toronto;
Jessica Marie Johnson, Johns Hopkins U and Harvard U; Martha S.
Jones, Johns Hopkins U; Annette K. Joseph-Gabriel, Duke U; Mills
Kelly, George Mason U; Spencer D. C. Keralis, Digital Frontiers;
Zoe LeBlanc, U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jason Edward Lewis,
Concordia U; James Malazita, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;
Alison Martin, Dartmouth College; Linda García Merchant, U of
Houston Libraries; Rafia Mirza, Southern Methodist U; Mame-Fatou
Niang, Carnegie Mellon U; Jessica Marie Otis, George Mason U;
Marisa Parham, U of Maryland; Andrew Boyles Petersen, Michigan
State U Libraries; Emily Pugh, Getty Research Institute; Olivia
Quintanilla, UC Santa Barbara; Jasmine Rault, U of Toronto
Scarborough; Anastasia Salter, U of Central Florida; Maura Seale, U
of Michigan; Celeste Tường Vy Sharpe, Normandale Community
College; Astrid J. Smith, Stanford U Libraries; Maboula Soumahoro,
U of Tours; Mel Stanfill, U of Central Florida; Tonia Sutherland, U
of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; Gabriela Baeza Ventura, U of Houston;
Carolina Villarroel, U of Houston; Melanie Walsh, U of Washington;
Hēmi Whaanga, U of Waikato; Bridget Whearty, Binghamton U; Jeri
Wieringa, U of Alabama; David Joseph Wrisley, NYU Abu Dhabi. Cover
alt text: A text-based cover with the main title repeating
right-side up and upside down. The leftmost iteration appears in
black ink; all others are white.
|
Data Feminism (Paperback)
Catherine D'Ignazio, Lauren F Klein
|
R684
R523
Discovery Miles 5 230
Save R161 (24%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
A groundbreaking synthesis of food studies, archival theory, and
early American literature There is no eating in the archive. This
is not only a practical admonition to any would-be researcher but
also a methodological challenge, in that there is no eating-or, at
least, no food-preserved among the printed records of the early
United States. Synthesizing a range of textual artifacts with
accounts (both real and imagined) of foods harvested, dishes
prepared, and meals consumed, An Archive of Taste reveals how a
focus on eating allows us to rethink the nature and significance of
aesthetics in early America, as well as of its archive. Lauren F.
Klein considers eating and early American aesthetics together,
reframing the philosophical work of food and its meaning for the
people who prepare, serve, and consume it. She tells the story of
how eating emerged as an aesthetic activity over the course of the
eighteenth century and how it subsequently transformed into a means
of expressing both allegiance and resistance to the dominant
Enlightenment worldview. Klein offers richly layered accounts of
the enslaved men and women who cooked the meals of the nation's
founders and, in doing so, directly affected the development of our
national culture-from Thomas Jefferson's emancipation agreement
with his enslaved chef to Malinda Russell's Domestic Cookbook, the
first African American-authored culinary text. The first book to
examine the gustatory origins of aesthetic taste in early American
literature, An Archive of Taste shows how thinking about eating can
help to tell new stories about the range of people who worked to
establish a cultural foundation for the United States.
A cutting-edge view of the digital humanities at a time of global
pandemic, catastrophe, and uncertainty Where do the digital
humanities stand in 2023? Debates in the Digital Humanities 2023
presents a state-of-the-field vision of digital humanities amid
rising social, political, economic, and environmental crises; a
global pandemic; and the deepening of austerity regimes in U.S.
higher education. Providing a look not just at where DH stands but
also where it is going, this fourth volume in the Debates in the
Digital Humanities series features both established scholars and
emerging voices pushing the field’s boundaries, asking thorny
questions, and providing space for practitioners to bring to the
fore their research and their hopes for future directions in the
field. Carrying forward the themes of political and social
engagement present in the series throughout, it includes crucial
contributions to the field—from a vital forum centered on the
voices of Black women scholars, manifestos from feminist and Latinx
perspectives on data and DH, and a consideration of Indigenous data
and artificial intelligence, to essays that range across topics
such as the relation of DH to critical race theory, capital, and
accessibility. Contributors: Harmony Bench, Ohio State U; Christina
Boyles, Michigan State U; Megan R. Brett, George Mason U; Michelle
Lee Brown, Washington State U; Patrick J. Burns, New York U; Kent
K. Chang, U of California, Berkeley; Rico Devara Chapman, Clark
Atlanta U; Marika Cifor, U of Washington; María Eugenia Cotera, U
of Texas; T. L. Cowan, U of Toronto; Marlene L. Daut, U of
Virginia; Quinn Dombrowski, Stanford U; Kate Elswit, U of London;
Nishani Frazier, U of Kansas; Kim Gallon, Brown U; Patricia Garcia,
U of Michigan; Lorena Gauthereau, U of Houston; Masoud
Ghorbaninejad, University of Victoria; Abraham Gibson, U of Texas
at San Antonio; Nathan P. Gibson, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität,
Munich; Kaiama L. Glover, Barnard College; Hilary N. Green,
Davidson College; Jo Guldi, Southern Methodist U; Matthew N.
Hannah, Purdue U Libraries; Jeanelle Horcasitas, DigitalOcean;
Christy Hyman, Mississippi State U; Arun Jacob, U of Toronto;
Jessica Marie Johnson, Johns Hopkins U and Harvard U; Martha S.
Jones, Johns Hopkins U; Annette K. Joseph-Gabriel, Duke U; Mills
Kelly, George Mason U; Spencer D. C. Keralis, Digital Frontiers;
Zoe LeBlanc, U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jason Edward Lewis,
Concordia U; James Malazita, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;
Alison Martin, Dartmouth College; Linda García Merchant, U of
Houston Libraries; Rafia Mirza, Southern Methodist U; Mame-Fatou
Niang, Carnegie Mellon U; Jessica Marie Otis, George Mason U;
Marisa Parham, U of Maryland; Andrew Boyles Petersen, Michigan
State U Libraries; Emily Pugh, Getty Research Institute; Olivia
Quintanilla, UC Santa Barbara; Jasmine Rault, U of Toronto
Scarborough; Anastasia Salter, U of Central Florida; Maura Seale, U
of Michigan; Celeste Tường Vy Sharpe, Normandale Community
College; Astrid J. Smith, Stanford U Libraries; Maboula Soumahoro,
U of Tours; Mel Stanfill, U of Central Florida; Tonia Sutherland, U
of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; Gabriela Baeza Ventura, U of Houston;
Carolina Villarroel, U of Houston; Melanie Walsh, U of Washington;
Hēmi Whaanga, U of Waikato; Bridget Whearty, Binghamton U; Jeri
Wieringa, U of Alabama; David Joseph Wrisley, NYU Abu Dhabi. Cover
alt text: A text-based cover with the main title repeating
right-side up and upside down. The leftmost iteration appears in
black ink; all others are white.
The latest installment of a digital humanities bellwether
Contending with recent developments like the shocking 2016 U.S.
Presidential election, the radical transformation of the social
web, and passionate debates about the future of data in higher
education, Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019 brings together a
broad array of important, thought-provoking perspectives on the
field's many sides. With a wide range of subjects including
gender-based assumptions made by algorithms, the place of the
digital humanities within art history, data-based methods for
exhuming forgotten histories, video games, three-dimensional
printing, and decolonial work, this book assembles a who's who of
the field in more than thirty impactful essays. Contributors:
Rafael Alvarado, U of Virginia; Taylor Arnold, U of Richmond; James
Baker, U of Sussex; Kathi Inman Berens, Portland State U; David M.
Berry, U of Sussex; Claire Bishop, The Graduate Center, CUNY; James
Coltrain, U of Nebraska-Lincoln; Crunk Feminist Collective; Johanna
Drucker, U of California-Los Angeles; Jennifer Edmond, Trinity
College; Marta Effinger-Crichlow, New York City College of
Technology-CUNY; M. Beatrice Fazi, U of Sussex; Kevin L. Ferguson,
Queens College-CUNY; Curtis Fletcher, U of Southern California;
Neil Fraistat, U of Maryland; Radhika Gajjala, Bowling Green State
U; Michael Gavin, U of South Carolina; Andrew Goldstone, Rutgers U;
Andrew Gomez, U of Puget Sound; Elyse Graham, Stony Brook U; Brian
Greenspan, Carleton U; John Hunter, Bucknell U; Steven J. Jackson,
Cornell U; Collin Jennings, Miami U; Lauren Kersey, Saint Louis U;
Kari Kraus, U of Maryland; Seth Long, U of Nebraska, Kearney; Laura
Mandell, Texas A&M U; Rachel Mann, U of South Carolina; Jason
Mittell, Middlebury College; Lincoln A. Mullen, George Mason U;
Trevor Munoz, U of Maryland; Safiya Umoja Noble, U of Southern
California; Jack Norton, Normandale Community College; Bethany
Nowviskie, U of Virginia; Elika Ortega, Northeastern U; Marisa
Parham, Amherst College; Jussi Parikka, U of Southampton; Kyle
Parry, U of California, Santa Cruz; Brad Pasanek, U of Virginia;
Stephen Ramsay, U of Nebraska-Lincoln; Matt Ratto, U of Toronto;
Katie Rawson, U of Pennsylvania; Ben Roberts, U of Sussex; David S.
Roh, U of Utah; Mark Sample, Davidson College; Moacir P. de Sa
Pereira, New York U; Tim Sherratt, U of Canberra; Bobby L. Smiley,
Vanderbilt U; Lauren Tilton, U of Richmond; Ted Underwood, U of
Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Megan Ward, Oregon State U; Claire
Warwick, Durham U; Alban Webb, U of Sussex; Adrian S. Wisnicki, U
of Nebraska-Lincoln.
A groundbreaking synthesis of food studies, archival theory, and
early American literature There is no eating in the archive. This
is not only a practical admonition to any would-be researcher but
also a methodological challenge, in that there is no eating-or, at
least, no food-preserved among the printed records of the early
United States. Synthesizing a range of textual artifacts with
accounts (both real and imagined) of foods harvested, dishes
prepared, and meals consumed, An Archive of Taste reveals how a
focus on eating allows us to rethink the nature and significance of
aesthetics in early America, as well as of its archive. Lauren F.
Klein considers eating and early American aesthetics together,
reframing the philosophical work of food and its meaning for the
people who prepare, serve, and consume it. She tells the story of
how eating emerged as an aesthetic activity over the course of the
eighteenth century and how it subsequently transformed into a means
of expressing both allegiance and resistance to the dominant
Enlightenment worldview. Klein offers richly layered accounts of
the enslaved men and women who cooked the meals of the nation's
founders and, in doing so, directly affected the development of our
national culture-from Thomas Jefferson's emancipation agreement
with his enslaved chef to Malinda Russell's Domestic Cookbook, the
first African American-authored culinary text. The first book to
examine the gustatory origins of aesthetic taste in early American
literature, An Archive of Taste shows how thinking about eating can
help to tell new stories about the range of people who worked to
establish a cultural foundation for the United States.
The latest installment of a digital humanities bellwether
Contending with recent developments like the shocking 2016 U.S.
Presidential election, the radical transformation of the social
web, and passionate debates about the future of data in higher
education, Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019 brings together a
broad array of important, thought-provoking perspectives on the
field's many sides. With a wide range of subjects including
gender-based assumptions made by algorithms, the place of the
digital humanities within art history, data-based methods for
exhuming forgotten histories, video games, three-dimensional
printing, and decolonial work, this book assembles a who's who of
the field in more than thirty impactful essays. Contributors:
Rafael Alvarado, U of Virginia; Taylor Arnold, U of Richmond; James
Baker, U of Sussex; Kathi Inman Berens, Portland State U; David M.
Berry, U of Sussex; Claire Bishop, The Graduate Center, CUNY; James
Coltrain, U of Nebraska-Lincoln; Crunk Feminist Collective; Johanna
Drucker, U of California-Los Angeles; Jennifer Edmond, Trinity
College; Marta Effinger-Crichlow, New York City College of
Technology-CUNY; M. Beatrice Fazi, U of Sussex; Kevin L. Ferguson,
Queens College-CUNY; Curtis Fletcher, U of Southern California;
Neil Fraistat, U of Maryland; Radhika Gajjala, Bowling Green State
U; Michael Gavin, U of South Carolina; Andrew Goldstone, Rutgers U;
Andrew Gomez, U of Puget Sound; Elyse Graham, Stony Brook U; Brian
Greenspan, Carleton U; John Hunter, Bucknell U; Steven J. Jackson,
Cornell U; Collin Jennings, Miami U; Lauren Kersey, Saint Louis U;
Kari Kraus, U of Maryland; Seth Long, U of Nebraska, Kearney; Laura
Mandell, Texas A&M U; Rachel Mann, U of South Carolina; Jason
Mittell, Middlebury College; Lincoln A. Mullen, George Mason U;
Trevor Munoz, U of Maryland; Safiya Umoja Noble, U of Southern
California; Jack Norton, Normandale Community College; Bethany
Nowviskie, U of Virginia; Elika Ortega, Northeastern U; Marisa
Parham, Amherst College; Jussi Parikka, U of Southampton; Kyle
Parry, U of California, Santa Cruz; Brad Pasanek, U of Virginia;
Stephen Ramsay, U of Nebraska-Lincoln; Matt Ratto, U of Toronto;
Katie Rawson, U of Pennsylvania; Ben Roberts, U of Sussex; David S.
Roh, U of Utah; Mark Sample, Davidson College; Moacir P. de Sa
Pereira, New York U; Tim Sherratt, U of Canberra; Bobby L. Smiley,
Vanderbilt U; Lauren Tilton, U of Richmond; Ted Underwood, U of
Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Megan Ward, Oregon State U; Claire
Warwick, Durham U; Alban Webb, U of Sussex; Adrian S. Wisnicki, U
of Nebraska-Lincoln.
A new way of thinking about data science and data ethics that is
informed by the ideas of intersectional feminism. Today, data
science is a form of power. It has been used to expose injustice,
improve health outcomes, and topple governments. But it has also
been used to discriminate, police, and surveil. This potential for
good, on the one hand, and harm, on the other, makes it essential
to ask: Data science by whom? Data science for whom? Data science
with whose interests in mind? The narratives around big data and
data science are overwhelmingly white, male, and techno-heroic. In
Data Feminism, Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein present a new
way of thinking about data science and data ethics-one that is
informed by intersectional feminist thought. Illustrating data
feminism in action, D'Ignazio and Klein show how challenges to the
male/female binary can help challenge other hierarchical (and
empirically wrong) classification systems. They explain how, for
example, an understanding of emotion can expand our ideas about
effective data visualization, and how the concept of invisible
labor can expose the significant human efforts required by our
automated systems. And they show why the data never, ever "speak
for themselves." Data Feminism offers strategies for data
scientists seeking to learn how feminism can help them work toward
justice, and for feminists who want to focus their efforts on the
growing field of data science. But Data Feminism is about much more
than gender. It is about power, about who has it and who doesn't,
and about how those differentials of power can be challenged and
changed.
Pairing full-length scholarly essays with shorter pieces drawn from
scholarly blogs and conference presentations, as well as
commissioned interviews and position statements, Debates in the
Digital Humanities 2016 reveals a dynamic view of a field in
negotiation with its identity, methods, and reach. Pieces in the
book explore how DH can and must change in response to social
justice movements and events like #Ferguson; how DH alters and is
altered by community college classrooms; and how scholars applying
DH approaches to feminist studies, queer studies, and black studies
might reframe the commitments of DH analysts. Numerous contributors
examine the movement of interdisciplinary DH work into areas such
as history, art history, and archaeology, and a special forum on
large-scale text mining brings together position statements on a
fast-growing area of DH research. In the multivalent aspects of its
arguments, progressing across a range of platforms and
environments, Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 offers a
vision of DH as an expanded field-new possibilities, differently
structured. Published simultaneously in print, e-book, and
interactive webtext formats, each DH annual will be a book-length
publication highlighting the particular debates that have shaped
the discipline in a given year. By identifying key issues as they
unfold, and by providing a hybrid model of open-access publication,
these volumes and the Debates in the Digital Humanities series will
articulate the present contours of the field and help forge its
future. Contributors: Moya Bailey, Northeastern U; Fiona Barnett;
Matthew Battles, Harvard U; Jeffrey M. Binder; Zach Blas, U of
London; Cameron Blevins, Rutgers U; Sheila A. Brennan, George Mason
U; Timothy Burke, Swarthmore College; Rachel Sagner Buurma,
Swarthmore College; Micha Cardenas, U of Washington-Bothell; Wendy
Hui Kyong Chun, Brown U; Tanya E. Clement, U of Texas-Austin; Anne
Cong-Huyen, Whittier College; Ryan Cordell, Northeastern U; Tressie
McMillan Cottom, Virginia Commonwealth U; Amy E. Earhart, Texas
A&M U; Domenico Fiormonte, U of Roma Tre; Paul Fyfe, North
Carolina State U; Jacob Gaboury, Stony Brook U; Kim Gallon, Purdue
U; Alex Gil, Columbia U; Brian Greenspan, Carleton U; Richard
Grusin, U of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Michael Hancher, U of Minnesota;
Molly O'Hagan Hardy; David L. Hoover, New York U; Wendy F. Hsu;
Patrick Jagoda, U of Chicago; Jessica Marie Johnson, Michigan State
U; Steven E. Jones, Loyola U; Margaret Linley, Simon Fraser U; Alan
Liu, U of California, Santa Barbara; Elizabeth Losh, U of
California, San Diego; Alexis Lothian, U of Maryland; Michael
Maizels, Wellesley College; Mark C. Marino, U of Southern
California; Anne B. McGrail, Lane Community College; Bethany
Nowviskie, U of Virginia; Julianne Nyhan, U College London; Amanda
Phillips, U of California, Davis; Miriam Posner, U of California,
Los Angeles; Rita Raley, U of California, Santa Barbara; Stephen
Ramsay, U of Nebraska-Lincoln; Margaret Rhee, U of Oregon; Lisa
Marie Rhody, Graduate Center, CUNY; Roopika Risam, Salem State U;
Stephen Robertson, George Mason U; Mark Sample, Davidson College;
Jentery Sayers, U of Victoria; Benjamin M. Schmidt, Northeastern U;
Scott Selisker, U of Arizona; Jonathan Senchyne, U of Wisconsin,
Madison; Andrew Stauffer, U of Virginia; Joanna Swafford, SUNY New
Paltz; Toniesha L. Taylor, Prairie View A&M U; Dennis Tenen;
Melissa Terras, U College London; Anna Tione; Ted Underwood, U of
Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Ethan Watrall, Michigan State U;
Jacqueline Wernimont, Arizona State U; Laura Wexler, Yale U;
Hong-An Wu, U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
|
|