|
Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Controversial knowledge > General
Despite millennia of fame, the origins of the Great Pyramid of Giza
are shrouded in mystery. Believed to be the tomb of an Egyptian
king, even though no remains have ever been found, its construction
date of roughly 2550 BCE is tied to only one piece of evidence: the
crudely painted marks within the pyramid's hidden chambers that
refer to the 4th Dynasty king Khufu, discovered in 1837 by Colonel
Howard Vyse and his team.Using evidence from the time of the
discovery of these "quarry marks" - including surveys, facsimile
drawings and Vyse's private field notes - along with high
definition photos of the actual marks, Scott Creighton reveals how
and why the marks were faked. Analyzing Vyse's private diary, he
reveals Vyse's forgery instructions to his two assistants, Raven
and Hill, and what the anachronistic sign should have been. He
examines recent chemical analysis of the marks along with the
eye-witness testimony of Humphries Brewer, who worked with Vyse at
Giza in 1837 and saw forgery take place. Exploring Vyse's
background, including his electoral fraud to become a member of the
British Parliament, he explains why he was driven to perpetrate a
fraud inside the Great Pyramid. Creighton's study strikes down one
of the most fundamental assertions of orthodox Egyptologists and
reopens long-standing questions about the Great Pyramid's true age,
who really built it, and why.
The Department of Distractions, an organisation so clandestine you
won't have heard of them. Until now. They say their job is to plant
stories in the world 'to make life more interesting.' Others would
argue that their job is as much to stop us looking in certain
directions. But a story they started has got out of hand, they've
lost control of it and now they're in danger of being exposed. How
far will they go to maintain their anonymity? Third Angel brings
you a conspiracy theory documentary-expose detective story for the
21st century that asks: What aren't you looking at?
#TheDepartmentOfDistractions
This unique and innovative text provides undergraduate students
with tools to think sociologically through the lens of everyday
life. Normative social organization and taken for granted beliefs
and actions are exposed as key mechanisms of power and social
inequality in western societies today. By "unpacking the centre"
students are encouraged to turn their social worlds inside out and
explore alternatives to the dominant social order. The text is
divided into three parts. In Part One students learn how to use
theory and methodology, which are blended seamlessly throughout the
text. It shows how to position Michel Foucault as a companion to
theorists such as Karl Marx and Stuart Hall, while signaling the
importance of non-western and Indigenous knowledges, experiences,
and rights. In Part Two, students explore - and challenge -
normativity; the normal body, heterosexuality, whiteness, the
two-gender system, aging, and the under-side of citizenship. In
Part Three, shorter chapters critique everyday practices such as
thinking scientifically, practicing self-help, going shopping,
managing money, buying coffee, being a tourist, and marginalizing
Indigeneity. Each chapter includes intriguing exercises, study
questions, and key terms that link to the volume's comprehensive
glossary. Instructors are provided PowerPoint slides, test banks,
and multimodal supplementary resources that make the book adaptable
to blended and online learning environments. Essay-style lectures
are also available to accompany the textbook.
This book analyzes the patterns of and factors associated with
health seeking behavior and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending on chronic
non-communicable diseases (CNCDs) in rural Malawi. The author used
descriptive statistics to describe treatment options and related
household OOP expenditure on CNCDs and econometrics models to
analyze factors influencing health seeking behavior and OOP
expenditure on CNCDs. This study found that in spite of a context
where care for CNCDs should in principle be free of charge at the
point of use, the utilization rates of CNCD care are still low and
OOP payments impose a considerable financial burden on rural
households, especially among the poorest.
|
|