|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > General
The Book of Answers According to Harry invites us to uncover Harry Styles’ wisdom and model it in our own lives. When there are hard decisions to be made or you need some positive words, tap into the power of this magical man to find the answers you have been searching for. It’s simple: Press play on your favourite Harry Styles’ song.Breathe deeply for three counts as Harry begins to sing, holding the closed book next to your heart.Allow Harry’s voice to enter your mind and focus on your question.See the question in your mind’s eye or say or sing it aloud.Run a finger along all the page edges and when you feel called, stop and open the book in that place. This is Harry’s answer to you.Trust in Harry to empower you on life’s journey.
With an introduction by Charlotte R. Brown and William Edward
Morris. David Hume (1711-1776) was the most important philosopher
ever to write in English, as well as a master stylist. This volume
contains his major philosophical works. A Treatise of Human Nature
(1739-1740), published while Hume was still in his twenties,
consists of three books on the understanding, the passions, and
morals. It applies the experimental method of reasoning to human
nature in a revolution that was intended to make Hume the Newton of
the moral sciences. Disappointed with the Treatise's failure to
bring about such a revolution, Hume later recast Book I as An
Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1751), and Book III as An
Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, which he regarded as
'incomparably the best' of all his works. Both Enquiries went
through several editions in his lifetime. Hume's works,
controversial in his day, remain deeply and widely influential in
ours, especially for his contributions to our understanding of the
nature of morality, political and economic theory, philosophy of
religion, and philosophical naturalism. This volume also includes
Hume's anonymous Abstract of Books I and II of the Treatise, and
the short autobiographical essay, 'My Own Life', which he wrote
just before his death.
This book critically analyses the basic questions regarding the
principle of beneficence within its moral domain, to suggest and
work out a more credible form of Principle of Beneficence. The
Moral Quest for a More Credible Principle of Beneficence evolves
from the common goodness of the three major confronting theories of
ethics, i.e., Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics. After
analysing and exploring the common ground of the three views, the
aim is to prescribe a more convincing form of the principle of
beneficence. The book starts with a brief discussion of the
principle of beneficence and then critically analyses previous
views related to the principle of beneficence, virtue of
benevolence, and their relationship, and proposes a more credible
form of the Principle of Beneficence. The Moral Quest for a More
Credible Principle of Beneficence aims to provide a significant
contribution towards the theory of beneficence.
We describe people who are “consumed” or “devoured” by
ambition as if by a predator or an out-of-control inferno. Thinkers
since deepest antiquity have raised these questions, approaching
the subject of ambition with ambivalence and often trepidation—as
when the ancient Greek poet Hesiod proposed a differentiation
between the good and the bad goddess Eris. Indeed, ambition as a
longing for immortal fame seems to be one of the unique hallmarks
of the human species. While philosophy has touched only
occasionally on the problem of burning ambition, sociology,
psychoanalysis, and world literature have provided rich and more
revealing descriptions and examples of its shaping role in human
history. Drawing on a long and varied tradition of writing on this
topic, ranging from the works of Homer through Shakespeare, Freud,
and Kafka and from the history of ancient Greece and Rome to the
Italian Renaissance and up to the present day (to modernity and the
current neoliberal era), Eckart Goebel explores our driving passion
for recognition — that insatiable hunter in the mirror — and
power.
Muslims, Islams and Occidental Anxietiesdeconstructs our common
prejudices about both the compatibility and incompatibility of
Muslim and Western civilizations. Rather than reinforcing the
well-meant, but misinformed, opinion that the religions all
fundamentally teach identical values, we identify what seem
different distinctive Muslim "goods." Rather than offering the
facile moral choice between an Islam either "all good" or "all
bad," we argue the case for pluralism derived from Sir Isaiah
Berlin. In many cases, Islam thus represents a distinctive system
of alternative ethical and religious "goods" to those valued in the
West. In other cases, differences will remain different and
unresolved. Far from necessarily threatening Western moral and
religious identity, we explore how the alternative "goods" Islam
offers the West can enrich our notions of what constitutes "the
good," even to the extent of reviving or enlivening certain Western
religious practices. Along with instructional guidelines for
classroom use, the book in informed by the powerful and
intellectually rigorous device of investigative, empathetic
"dialogue" or "conversation," as articulated by MIT's Sherry Turkle
and Oxford's Theodore Zeldin, respectively. This form of dialogue
steers clear of the didactic mode and instead recovers the open
models of philosophical dialogues pioneered by Plato, Socrates, and
the "tolerant" Renaissance humanists, such as Erasmus and Jean
Bodin.
The articles assembled in this volume present an important
selection of Professor Jao Tsung-i's research in the field of the
early Chinese intellectual tradition, especially as it concerns the
human condition. Whether his focus is on myth, religion, philosophy
or morals, Jao consistently aims to describe how the series of
developments broadly associated with the Axial Age unfolded in
China. He is particularly interested in showing how early China had
developed its own notion of transcendence as well as a system of
prediction and morals that enabled man to act autonomously, without
recourse to divine providence.
|
|