|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > General
 |
Faith Flies
(Hardcover)
Allison F Speer; Illustrated by Mike Jones
|
R471
Discovery Miles 4 710
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
 |
Q
(Hardcover)
Terence Meaden
|
R790
Discovery Miles 7 900
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
|
Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has had, and continues to have, an
enormous impact on modern philosophy. In this short, stimulating
introduction, Michael Pendlebury explains Kant’s major claims in
the Critique, how they hang together, and how Kant supports them,
clarifying the way in which his reasoning unfolds over the course
of this groundbreaking work. Making Sense of Kant’s Critique of
Pure Reason concentrates on key parts of the Critique that are
essential to a basic understanding of Kant’s project and provides
a sympathetic account of Kant’s reasoning about perception,
space, time, judgment, substance, causation, objectivity, synthetic
a priori knowledge, and the illusions of transcendent metaphysics.
The guiding assumptions of the book are that Kant is a humanist;
that his reasoning in the Critique is driven by an interest in
human knowledge and the cognitive capacities that underlie it; and
that he is not a skeptic, but accepts that human beings have
objective knowledge and seeks to explain how this is possible.
Pendlebury provides an integrated and accessible account of
Kant’s explanation that will help those who are new to the
Critique make sense of it.
The first scholarly book on Thomas Vaughan (1621-1666) draws from
recent studies in Western esotericism to place his famously
difficult writings in their proper context. It shows that they
develop themes from a distinctively Rosicrucian synthesis of
alchemy, magic, and Christian cabala. Vaughan introduced
Rosicrucian documents to English readers and placed them in older
philosophical contexts during the breakdown of censorship that
followed the English Revolution against the old order in politics
and religion. Willard's book will appeal to students of early
modern ideas about religion, science, and society as they were seen
by an intelligent and eloquent outsider.
The Film Theory in Practice series fills a gaping hole in the world
of film theory. By marrying the explanation of a film theory with
the interpretation of a film, the volumes provide discrete examples
of how film theory can serve as the basis for textual analysis.
Realist Film Theory and Bicycle Thieves offers a concise
introduction to realist film theory in jargon-free language and
shows how this theory can be deployed to interpret Vittorio De
Sica’s 1948 Italian neo realist masterpiece Bicycle Thieves.
Hilary Neroni explores the original realist film theorists from the
1940s: André Bazin, Siegfried Kracauer, and Cesare Zavattini,
among others. But rather than seeing realist film theory as simply
a theory of the past to be moved beyond, the book argues that the
prevalence of realism in many different forms within practice and
theory suggests the importance of updating this original realist
film theory with an understanding of realism that would sustain its
viability. Throughout the book, Neroni analyzes neorealist film
movements—such as Italian Neorealism, Parallel Cinema of India,
and the Iranian New Wave—that challenge mainstream realism with a
more radical form that exposes the social order instead of hiding
it. Her in-depth investigation of Bicycle Thieves provides a
realist methodology that reveals the radicality of its combination
of realist techniques, a melodramatic story, and humanist values.
The focus of this volume is on political discourse about the
pattern and desirability of economic development, and how/why
historical interpretations of social phenomena connected to this
systemic process alter. It is a trajectory pursued here with
reference to the materialism of Marxism, via the mid-nineteenth
century ideas about race, through the development decade, the
'cultural turn', debates about modes of production and their
respective labour regimes, culminating in the role played by
immigration before and after the Brexit referendum. Also examined
is the trajectory followed by travel writing, and how many of its
core assumptions overlap with those made in the social sciences and
development studies. The object is to account for the way concepts
informing these trajectories do or do not alter.
|
|