|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present
The English philosopher Herbert Spencer (1820 - 1903) was a
colossus of the Victorian age. His works ranked alongside those of
Darwin and Marx in the development of disciplines as wide ranging
as sociology, anthropology, political theory, philosophy and
psychology. In this acclaimed study of Spencer, the first for over
thirty years and now available in paperback, Mark Francis provides
an authoritative and meticulously researched intellectual biography
of this remarkable man that dispels the plethora of misinformation
surrounding Spencer and shines new light on the broader cultural
history of the nineteenth century. In this major study of Spencer,
the first for over thirty years, Mark Francis provides an
authoritative and meticulously researched intellectual biography of
this remarkable man. Using archival material and contemporary
printed sources, Francis creates a fascinating portrait of a human
being whose philosophical and scientific system was a unique
attempt to explain modern life in all its biological, psychological
and sociological forms. Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern
Life fills what is perhaps the last big biographical gap in
Victorian history. An exceptional work of scholarship it not only
dispels the plethora of misinformation surrounding Spencer but
shines new light on the broader cultural history of the nineteenth
century. Elegantly written, provocative and rich in insight it will
be required reading for all students of the period.
This book is collection of published and unpublished essays on the
philosophy of religion by Howard Wettstein, who is a widely
respected analytic philosopher. Over the past twenty years,
Wettstein has attempted to reconcile his faith with his philosophy,
and he brings his personal investment in this mission to the essays
collected here. Influenced by the work of George Santayana,
Wittgenstein, and A.J. Heschel, Wettstein grapples with central
issues in the philosophy of religion such as the relationship of
religious practice to religious belief, what is at stake in the
debate between atheists and theists, and the place of doctrine in
religion. His discussions draw from Jewish texts as well as
Christianity, Islam, and classical philosophy. The challenge
Wettstein undertakes throughout the volume is to maintain a
philosophical naturalism while pursuing an encounter with God and
traditional religion. In the Introduction to this volume, Wettstein
elucidates the uniting themes among the collected essays.
The Bible has always been a contested legacy. Form late antiquity
to the Refomation, debates about the Bible took place at the center
of manifold movements that defined Western civilization. In the
eigtheenth century, Europe's scriptural inheritance surfaced once
again at a critical moment. During the Enlightenment, scholars
guided by a new vision of a post-theological age did not simply
investigate the Bible, they remade it. In place of the familiar
scriptural Bibles that belonged to Christian and Jewish
communities, they created a new form: the academic Bible. In this
book, Michael Legaspi examines the creation of the academic Bible.
Beginning with the fragmentation of biblical interpretation in the
centuries after the Reformation, Legaspi shows how the weakening of
scriptural authority in the Western churches altered the role of
biblical interpretation. In contexts shaped by skepticism and
religious strife, interpreters increasingly operated on the Bible
as a text to be managed by critical tools. These developments
prepared the way for scholars to formalize an approach to biblical
study oriented toward the statist vision of the new universities
and their sponsors. Focusing on a renowned German scholar of the
period, Johann David Michaelis (1717-1791), Legaspi explores the
ways that critics reconceived authority of the Bible by creating an
institutional framework for biblical interpretation designed to
parallel-and replace-scriptural reading. This book offers a new
account of the origins of biblical studies, illuminating the
relation of the Bible to churchly readers, theological
interpreters, academic critics, and people in between. It explains
why, in an age of religious resurgence, modern biblical criticism
may no longer be in a position to serve as the Bible's disciplinary
gatekeeper.
The "Nations" are the "seventy nations": a metaphor which, in the
Talmudic idiom, designates the whole of humanity surrounding
Israel. In this major collection of essays, Levinas considers
Judaism's uncertain relationship to European culture since the
Enlightenment, problems of distance and integration. It also
includes essays on Franz Rosenzweig and Moses Mendelssohn, and a
discussion of central importance to Jewish philosophy in the
context of general philosophy. This work brings to the fore the
vital encounter between philosophy and Judaism, a hallmark of
Levinas's thought.
The World We Want compares the future world that Enlightenment
intellectuals had hoped for with our own world at present. In what
respects do the two worlds differ, and why are they so different?
To what extent is and isn't our world the world they wanted, and to
what extent do we today still want their world? Unlike previous
philosophical critiques and defenses of the Enlightenment, the
present study focuses extensively on the relevant historical and
empirical record first, by examining carefully what kind of future
Enlightenment intellectuals actually hoped for; second, by tracking
the different legacies of their central ideals over the past two
centuries.
But in addition to documenting the significant gap that still
exists between Enlightenment ideals and current realities, the
author also attempts to show why the ideals of the Enlightenment
still elude us. What does our own experience tell us about the
appropriateness of these ideals? Which Enlightenment ideals do not
fit with human nature? Why is meaningful support for these ideals,
particularly within the US, so weak at present? Which of the means
that Enlightenment intellectuals advocated for realizing their
ideals are inefficacious? Which of their ideals have devolved into
distorted versions of themselves when attempts have been made to
realize them? How and why, after more than two centuries, have we
still failed to realize the most significant Enlightenment ideals?
In short, what is dead and what is living in these ideals?
Cheryl Misak presents the first collective study of the development
of philosophy in North America, from the 18th century to the end of
the 20th century. Twenty-six leading experts examine distinctive
features of American philosophy, trace notable themes, and consider
the legacy and influence of notable figures. This will be the first
reference point for future work on the subject, and a fascinating
resource for anyone interested in modern philosophy or American
intellectual history.
Conversations with My Dog by Hannah Gold is a tale for those who
love to seek new adventures and the promise of following their
dreams, or nose, into the unknown. In a fast-paced world, driven by
material achievement and the fear of loss; clarity can seem hard to
find. Sometimes answers can come from the most surprising sources.
When the author found herself confronted with challenges, she
discovered, to her surprise, that wisdom came not from a
philosophical master or spiritual guide, but her puppy named Monty.
On the road with him, she learns to stop and ask him questions. He
answers her through demonstrating the values of simplicity, fun and
love of exploration. This description of the conversations that
developed between them is a tale about rediscovering direction in
life. It gives a light-hearted, gently thought-provoking account of
the bigger journey of working out how to live. The search for the
way ahead is the metaphor that illustrates the eternal bond of
loyalty between a dog and its humanand makes this tale transcend
normal conversation. 'Even when we are in small bodies, we have big
spirits.' Writes Hannah Gold, relaying the replies of her wise
four-legged friend, to her questions about life. 'The very young
always know why they are here. Because they haven't forgotten.
Sometimes life muddles things up with too many thoughts. But the
heart is ageless.' Hannah's illustrations were created from
sketches she made of Monty on their travels. These drawings provide
a visual tapestry, depicting their journey together to inspire
readers in finding their own path. Conversations with My Dog is an
ideal companion for people considering significant change or
embarking on a new direction, however uncertain, or even just
searching for a little extra companionship and inspiration.
Since the early 1990s, there has been a resurgence of interest in
philosophy between Kant and Hegel, and in early German romanticism
in particular. Philosophers have come to recognize that, in spite
of significant differences between the contemporary and romantic
contexts, romanticism continues to persist, and the questions which
the romantics raised remain relevant today. The Relevance of
Romanticism: Essays on Early German Romantic Philosophy is the
first collection of essays that offers an in-depth analysis of the
reasons why philosophers are (and should be) concerned with
romanticism. Through historical and systematic reconstructions, the
collection offers a deeper understanding and more encompassing
picture of romanticism as a philosophical movement than has been
presented thus far, and explicates the role that romanticism plays
- or can play - in contemporary philosophical debates. The volume
includes essays by a number of preeminent international scholars
and philosophers - Karl Ameriks, Frederick Beiser, Richard
Eldridge, Michael Forster, Manfred Frank, Jane Kneller, and Paul
Redding - who discuss the nature of philosophical romanticism and
its potential to address contemporary questions and concerns.
Through contributions from established and emerging philosophers,
discussing key romantic themes and concerns, the volume highlights
the diversity both within romantic thought and its contemporary
reception. Part One consists of the first published encounter
between Manfred Frank and Frederick Beiser, in which the two major
scholars directly discuss their vastly differing interpretations of
philosophical romanticism. Part Two draws significant connections
between romantic conceptions of history, sociability, hermeneutics
and education and explores the ways in which these views can
illuminate pressing questions in contemporary social-political
philosophy and theories of interpretation. Part Three consists in
some of the most innovative takes on romantic aesthetics, which
seek to bring romantic thought into dialogue, with, for instance,
contemporary Analytic aesthetics and theories of cognition/mind.
The final part offers one of the few rigorous engagements with
romantic conceptions science, and demonstrates ways in which the
romantic views of nature, scientific experimentation and
mathematics need not be relegated to historical curiosities.
The Das Kapital of the 20th century. An essential text, and the
main theoretical work of the situationists. Few works of political
and cultural theory have been as enduringly provocative. From its
publication amid the social upheavals of the 1960's up to the
present, the volatile theses of this book have decisively
transformed debates on the shape of modernity, capitalism, and
everyday life in the late 20th century. This is the original
translation by Fredy Perlman, kept in print continuously for the
last 30 years, keeping the flame alive when no-one else cared.
Thomas C. Vinci aims to reveal and assess the structure of Kant's
argument in the Critique of Pure Reason called the "Transcendental
Deduction of the Categories." At the end of the first part of the
Deduction in the B-edition Kant states that his purpose is
achieved: to show that all intuitions in general are subject to the
categories. On the standard reading, this means that all of our
mental representations, including those originating in
sense-experience, are structured by conceptualization. But this
reading encounters an exegetical problem: Kant states in the second
part of the Deduction that a major part of what remains to be shown
is that empirical intuitions are subject to the categories. How can
this be if it has already been shown that intuitions in general are
subject to the categories? Vinci calls this the Triviality Problem,
and he argues that solving it requires denying the standard
reading. In its place he proposes that intuitions in general and
empirical intuitions constitute disjoint classes and that, while
all intuitions for Kant are unified, there are two kinds of
unification: logical unification vs. aesthetic unification. Only
the former is due to the categories. A second major theme of the
book is that Kant's Idealism comes in two versions-for laws of
nature and for objects of empirical intuition-and that
demonstrating these versions is the ultimate goal of the Deduction
of the Categories and the similarly structured Deduction of the
Concepts of Space, respectively. Vinci shows that the Deductions
have the argument structure of an inference to the best explanation
for correlated domains of explananda, each arrived at by
independent applications of Kantian epistemic and geometrical
methods.
Frank Jackson champions the cause of conceptual analysis as central
to philosophical inquiry. In recent years conceptual analysis has
been undervalued and, Jackson suggests, widely misunderstood; he
argues that there is nothing especially mysterious about it and a
whole range of important questions cannot be productively addressed
without it. He anchors his argument in discussion of specific
philosophical issues, starting with the metaphysical doctrine of
physicalism and moving on, via free will, meaning, personal
identity, motion and change, to the philosophy of colour and to
ethics. The significance of different kinds of supervenience
theses, Kripke and Putnam's work in the philosophy of modality and
language, and the role of intuitions about possible cases receive
detailed attention. Jackson concludes with a defence of a version
of analytical descriptivism in ethics. In this way the book not
only offers a methodological programme for philosophy, but also
throws fascinating new light on some much-debated problems and
their interrelations. puffs which may be quoted (please do not edit
without consulting OUP editor): 'This is an outstanding book. It
covers a vast amount of philosophy in a very short space, advances
a number of original and striking positions, and manages to be both
clear and concise in its expositions of other views and forceful in
its criticisms of them. The book offers something new for those
interested in the various individual problems it
discusses-conceptual analysis, the mind-body relation, secondary
qualities, modality, and ethical realism. But unifying these
individual discussions is an ambitious structure which amounts to
an outline of a complete metaphysical system, and an outline of an
epistemology for this metaphysics. It is hard to think of a central
area of analytic philosophy which will not be touched by Jackson's
conclusions.' Tim Crane, Reader in Philosophy, University College
London 'The writing is clear, straightforward, and down to
earth-the usual virtues one expects from Jackson . . . what he has
to say is innovative and valuable . . . the book deals with a large
number of apparently diverse philosophical issues, but it is also
an elegantly unified work. What gives it unity is the
metaphilosophical framework that Jackson works out with great care
and persuasiveness. This is the first serious and sustained work on
the methodology of metaphysics in recent memory. What he says about
the role of conceptual analysis in metaphysics is an important and
timely contribution. . . . It is refreshing and heartening to see a
first-class analytic philosopher doing some serious
metaphilosophical work . . . I think that the book will be greeted
as an important event in philosophical publishing.' Jaegwon Kim,
Professor of Philosophy, Brown University
Meaning (significance) and nature are this book's principal topics.
They seem an odd couple, like raisins and numbers, though they
elide when meanings of a global sort-ideologies and religions, for
example-promote ontologies that subordinate nature. Setting one
against the other makes reality contentious. It signifies workmates
and a coal face to miners, gluons to physicists, prayer and
redemption to priests. Are there many realities, or many
perspectives on one? The answer I prefer is the comprehensive
naturalism anticipated by Aristotle and Spinoza: "natura naturans,
natura naturata." Nature naturing is an array of mutually
conditioning material processes in spacetime. Each structure or
event-storm clouds forming, nature natured-is self-differentiating,
self-stabilizing, and sometimes self-disassembling; each alters or
transforms a pre-existing state of affairs. This surmise
anticipated discoveries and analyses to which neither thinker had
access, though physics and biology confirm their hypothesis beyond
reasonable doubt. Hence the question this book considers: Is
reality divided:nature vrs. lived experience? Or is experience,
with all its meanings and values, the complex expression of natural
processes?
The Seventeenth-Century philosopher, scientist, poet, playwright,
and novelist Margaret Cavendish went to battle with the great
thinkers of her time, and arguably got the better of them in many
cases. She took a creative and systematic stand on the major
questions of philosophy of mind, epistemology, metaphysics, and
political philosophy. She argued that human beings and all other
members of the created universe are purely material creatures, and
she held that there are many other ways in which creatures are
alike as well: for example, human beings, non-human animals,
spiders, cells, and all other beings exhibit skill, wisdom, and
activity, and so the universe of matter is not the largely dead and
unimpressive region that most of her contemporaries thought it to
be. Creatures instead are sophisticated and display a wide spectrum
of intelligent activity, ranging from the highly conscious
mentality that Descartes posited to be part and parcel of human
thought, to embodied forms of cognition that is more common in
non-human creatures but that guide a significant portion of human
behavior as well. Cavendish then used her fictional work to further
illustrate her views and arguments, and also to craft alternative
fictional worlds in which the climate for women was very different
than on Seventeenth-Century earth - a climate in which women could
be taken seriously in the role of philosopher, writer, scientist,
military general, and other roles. This is the first volume to
provide a cross-section of Cavendish's writings, views and
arguments, along with introductory material. It excerpts the key
portions of all her texts including annotated notes highlighting
the interconnections between them. Including a general introduction
by Cunning, the book will allow students to work toward a
systematic picture of Cavendish's metaphysics, epistemology, and
political philosophy (and including some of her non-philosophical
work as well) and to see her in dialogue with philosophers who are
part of the traditional canon.
We have long been taught that the Enlightenment was an attempt to
free the world from the clutches of Christian civilization and make
it safe for philosophy. The lesson has been well learned--in
today's culture wars, both liberals and their conservative enemies,
inside and outside the academy, rest their claims about the present
on the notion that the Enlightenment was a secularist movement of
philosophically-driven emancipation. Historians have had doubts
about the accuracy of this portrait for some time, but they have
never managed to furnish a viable alternative to it--for
themselves, for scholars interested in matters of church and state,
or for the public at large. In this book, William J. Bulman and
Robert Ingram bring together recent scholarship from distinguished
experts in history, theology, and literature to make clear that God
not only survived the Enlightenment, but thrived within it as well.
The Enlightenment was not a radical break from the past in which
Europeans jettisoned their intellectual and institutional
inheritance. It was, to be sure, a moment of great change, but one
in which the characteristic convictions and traditions of the
Renaissance and Reformation were perpetuated to the point of
transformation, in the wake of the Wars of Religion and during the
early phases of globalization. Its primary imperatives were not
freedom and irreligion but peace and prosperity. As a result, it
could be Christian, communitarian, or authoritarian as easily as it
could be atheist, individualist, or libertarian. Honing in on the
intellectual crisis of late seventeenth and early eighteenth
centuries while moving everywhere from Spinoza to Kant and from
India to Peru, God in the Enlightenment offers a spectral view of
the age of lights.
|
|