|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Non-Western philosophy > Oriental & Indian philosophy
This work offers a new perspective on the work of Confucius, the
great reference of classical Chinese thought. In general,
relatively little work has been done on Confucius' linguistic
concerns, which nevertheless did have an impact in his time and
afterwards. The author starts from a sociolinguistic approach,
based mainly on the ethnography of communication, to analyze the
role played by language in Confucius' texts and its links with the
ethical program proposed therein. It is, therefore, a considerably
novel perspective which, moreover, allows us to cover a very
relevant number of interests. The pages of this work concern
sociolinguists, but also historians of linguistics, philosophers,
and cultural scientists in general. In short, it provides a
different vision of one of the great cultural references of
humanity.
Gandhi and Philosophy presents a breakthrough in philosophy by
foregrounding modern and scientific elements in Gandhi's thought,
animating the dazzling materialist concepts in his writings and
opening philosophy to the new frontier of nihilism. This
scintillating work breaks with the history of Gandhi scholarship,
removing him from the postcolonial and Hindu-nationalist axis and
disclosing him to be the enemy that the philosopher dreads and
needs. Naming the congealing systematicity of Gandhi's thoughts
with the Kantian term hypophysics, Mohan and Dwivedi develop his
ideas through a process of reason that awakens the possibilities of
concepts beyond the territorial determination of philosophical
traditions. The creation of the new method of criticalisation - the
augmentation of critique - brings Gandhi's system to its exterior
and release. It shows the points of intersection and infiltration
between Gandhian concepts and such issues as will, truth, violence,
law, anarchy, value, politics and metaphysics and compels us to
imagine Gandhi's thought anew.
Covering the historical, social, political, and cultural contexts,
The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Chinese Philosophy and Gender
presents a comprehensive overview of the complexity of gender
disparity in Chinese thought and culture. Divided into four main
sections, an international group of experts in Chinese Studies
write on Confucian, Daoist and Buddhist approaches to gender
relations. Each section includes a general introduction, a set of
authoritative articles written by leading scholars and
comprehensive bibliographies, designed to provide the
non-specialist with a practical and broad overview. Beginning with
the Ancient and Medieval period before moving on to Modern and
Contemporary approaches, specially commissioned chapters include
Pre-Qin canonical texts, women in early Chinese ethics, the
yin-yang gender dynamic and the Buddhist understanding of the
conception of gender. Considering why the philosophy of women and
gender dynamics in Chinese thought is rarely confronted, The
Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Chinese Philosophy and Gender is a
pioneering cross-disciplinary introduction to Chinese philosophy's
intersection with gender studies. By bridging the fields of Chinese
philosophy, religion, intellectual history, feminism, and gender
studies, this cutting-edge volume fills a great need in the current
literature on Chinese philosophy and provides student and scholars
with an invaluable research resource to a growing field.
Featuring leading scholars from philosophy and religious studies,
The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Ethics dispels the myth
that Indian thinkers and philosophers were uninterested in ethics.
This comprehensive research handbook traces Indian moral philosophy
through classical, scholastic Indian philosophy, pan-Indian
literature including the Epics, Ayurvedic medical ethics, as well
as recent, traditionalist and Neo-Hindu contributions. Contrary to
the usual myths about India (that Indians were too busy being
religious to care about ethics), moral theory constitutes the
paradigmatic differentia of formal Indian philosophy, and is
reflected richly in popular literature. Many of the papers make
this clear by an analytic explication that draws critical
comparisons and contrasts between classical Indian moral philosophy
and contemporary contributions to ethics. By critically addressing
ethics as a sub-discipline of philosophy and acknowledging the
mistaken marginalization of Indian moral philosophy, this handbook
reveals how Indian contributions can illuminate contemporary
philosophical research on ethics. Unlike previous approaches to
Indian ethics, this volume is organized in accordance with major
topics in moral philosophy. The volume contains an extended
introduction, exploring topics in moral semantics, the philosophy
of thought, (metaethical and normative) ethical theory, and the
politics of scholarship, which serve to show how the diversity of
Indian moral philosophy is a contribution to the discipline of
ethics. With an overview of Indian moral theory, and a glossary,
this is a valuable guide to understanding the past, present and
future research directions of a central component of Indian
philosophy.
This book (hardcover) is part of the TREDITION CLASSICS. It
contains classical literature works from over two thousand years.
Most of these titles have been out of print and off the bookstore
shelves for decades. The book series is intended to preserve the
cultural legacy and to promote the timeless works of classical
literature. Readers of a TREDITION CLASSICS book support the
mission to save many of the amazing works of world literature from
oblivion. With this series, tredition intends to make thousands of
international literature classics available in printed format again
- worldwide.
Contemporary scholars of Chinese philosophy often presuppose that
early China possessed a naturalistic worldview, devoid of any
non-natural concepts, such as transcendence. Challenging this
presupposition head-on, Joshua R. Brown and Alexus McLeod argue
that non-naturalism and transcendence have a robust and significant
place in early Chinese thought. This book reveals that
non-naturalist positions can be found in early Chinese texts, in
topics including conceptions of the divine, cosmogony, and
apophatic philosophy. Moreover, by closely examining a range of
early Chinese texts, and providing comparative readings of a number
of Western texts and thinkers, the book offers a way of reading
early Chinese Philosophy as consistent with the religious
philosophy of the East and West, including the Abrahamic and the
Brahmanistic religions. Co-written by a philosopher and theologian,
this book draws out unique insights into early Chinese thought,
highlighting in particular new ways to consider a range of Chinese
concepts, including tian, dao, li, and you/wu.
|
|