|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Alternative belief systems > Syncretist & eclectic religions & belief systems
Augustine's Early Thought on the Redemptive Function of Divine
Judgement considers the relationship between Augustine's account of
God's judgment and his theology of grace in his early works. How
does God use his law and the penal consequences of its
transgression in the service of his grace, both personally and
through his 'agents' on earth? Augustine reflected on this question
from different perspectives. As a teacher and bishop, he thought
about the nature of discipline and punishment in the education of
his pupils, brothers, and congregants. As a polemicist against the
Manichaeans and as a biblical expositor, he had to grapple with
issues regarding God's relationship to evil in the world, the
violence God displays in the Old Testament, and in the death of his
own Son. Furthermore, Augustine meditated on the way God's judgment
and grace related in his own life, both before and after his
conversion. Bart van Egmond follows the development of Augustine's
early thought on judgment and grace from the Cassiacum writings to
the Confessions. The argument is contextualized both against the
background of the earlier Christian tradition of reflection on the
providential function of divine chastisement, and the tradition of
psychagogy that Augustine inherited from a variety of rhetorical
and philosophical sources. This study expertly contributes to the
ongoing scholarly discussion on the development of Augustine's
doctrine of grace, and to the conversation on the theological roots
of his justification of coercion against the Donatists.
What is the principal secret of the universe? The ancient mystery
saying called on the human being to 'Know Yourself ' Rudolf Steiner
explains that this maxim is not asking us to study subjectively our
own personal character, but rather to come to a knowledge of our
true, archetypal human nature-and with it the position we occupy in
the universe. In these eloquent lectures - formerly published as
Man, Hieroglyph of the Universe - Rudolf Steiner speaks of the
human being as the model of creation, the primary focus of the
cosmos. In an extensive exposition he talks of the constellation of
cosmic forces, zodiac and planets amongst which we find ourselves
situated. Only a true knowledge of our human nature and the
spiritual forces which surround us - the microcosm within the
greater macrocosm - can enable humanity to progress, he says. This
book is an important contribution to that goal: the development of
a contemporary spiritual science of the human being.
In The Persistence of the Sacred in Modern Thought, Chris L.
Firestone, Nathan A. Jacobs, and thirteen other contributors
examine the role of God in the thought of major European
philosophers from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. The
philosophers considered are, by and large, not orthodox theists;
they are highly influential freethinkers, emancipated by an age no
longer tethered to the authority of church and state. While
acknowledging this fact, the contributors are united in arguing
that this is only one side of a complex story. To redress the
imbalance of attention to secularism among crucial modern thinkers
and to consolidate a more theologically informed view of modernity,
they focus on the centrality of the sacred (theology and God) in
the thought of these philosophers. The essays, each in its own way,
argue that the major figures in modernity are theologically astute,
bent not on removing God from philosophy but on putting faith and
reason on a more sure footing in light of advancements in science
and a perceived need to rethink the relationship between God and
world. By highlighting and defending the theologically affirmative
dimensions of thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, Gottfried Leibniz,
John Locke, Immanuel Kant, F. W. J. Schelling, G. W. F. Hegel, and
others, the essayists present a forceful and timely correction of
widely accepted interpretations of these philosophers. To ignore or
downplay the theological dimensions of the philosophical works they
address, they argue, distorts our understanding of modern thought.
Contributors: Nicholas Adams, Hubert Bost, Philip Clayton, John
Cottingham, Yolanda Estes, Chris L. Firestone, Lee Hardy, Peter C.
Hodgson, Nathan A. Jacobs, Jacqueline Marina, A. P. Martinich,
Richard A. Muller, Myron B. Penner, Stephen D. Snobelen, Nicholas
Wolterstorff.
|
|