Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Semantics (meaning) > Pragmatics
|
Buy Now
Indirect Reports and Pragmatics - Interdisciplinary Studies (Hardcover, 1st ed. 2016)
Loot Price: R5,565
Discovery Miles 55 650
|
|
Indirect Reports and Pragmatics - Interdisciplinary Studies (Hardcover, 1st ed. 2016)
Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 5
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
This volume offers the reader a singular overview of current
thinking on indirect reports. The contributors are eminent
researchers from the fields of philosophy of language, theoretical
linguistics and communication theory, who answer questions on this
important issue. This exciting area of controversy has until now
mostly been treated from the viewpoint of philosophy. This volume
adds the views from semantics, conversation analysis and
sociolinguistics. Authors address matters such as the issue of
semantic minimalism vs. radical contextualism, the attribution of
responsibility for the modes of presentation associated with Noun
Phrases and how to distinguish the indirect reporter's
responsibility from the original speaker's responsibility. They
also explore the connection between indirect reporting and direct
quoting. Clearly indirect reporting has some bearing on the
semantics/pragmatics debate, however, there is much controversy on
"what is said", whether this is a minimal semantic logical form
(enriched by saturating pronominals) or a much richer and fully
contextualized logical form. This issue will be discussed from
several angles. Many of the authors are contextualists and the
discussion brings out the need to take context into account when
one deals with indirect reports, both the context of the original
utterance and the context of the report. It is interesting to see
how rich cues and clues can radically transform the reported
message, assigning illocutionary force and how they can be
mobilized to distinguish several voices in the utterance.
Decoupling the voice of the reporting speaker from that of the
reported speaker on the basis of rich contextual clues is an
important issue that pragmatic theory has to tackle. Articles on
the issue of slurs will bring new light to the issue of decoupling
responsibility in indirect reporting, while others are
theoretically oriented and deal with deep problems in philosophy
and epistemology.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.