Since time immemorial, men have assumed superior innate qualities
which have justified them in exerting power over the other sex
right up to the twentieth century. The last few years have seen the
emergence of a new literary genre: to show that despite this, women
have managed to become outstanding writers, artists, scientists,
explorers, rulers and politicians. Of such books, none discusses a
fundamental question: is the supposed male superiority biological,
or has it arisen for some other reason over the course of time?
This is the issue that Androcentrism: The Ascendancy of Man
addresses.The stronger physique of males may have given
Palaeolithic man a feeling of superiority, but the two sexes
probably lived in fairly gender-neutral, or even matriarchal,
groups right up to the end of the Neolithic Age. Charles Pasternak
argues that it was the emergence of hierarchies, like chiefdom,
that largely sparked androcentrism. It became established as
villages grew into towns, with the ownership of property as an
important ingredient, during the Bronze Age. While the Mediaeval
Period was a time of slight respite for women, the Age of
Enlightenment in Europe did not bolster this trend; it reversed it.
Not until the latter half of the nineteenth century was
androcentrism beginning to be seriously questioned, but significant
change happened only after World War I. Today androcentrism has
virtually disappeared from most parts of the world. It was just a
cultural blip, albeit one that lasted over 5,000 years.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!