0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure

Buy Now

True to Form - Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English (Paperback) Loot Price: R1,694
Discovery Miles 16 940
True to Form - Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English (Paperback): Christine Gunlogson

True to Form - Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English (Paperback)

Christine Gunlogson

Series: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R1,694 Discovery Miles 16 940 | Repayment Terms: R159 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

Donate to Against Period Poverty

This book is concerned with the meaning and use of two kinds of declarative sentences: 1) It's raining? 2) It's raining. The difference between (1) and (2) is intonational: (1) has a final rise--indicated by the question mark--while (2) ends with a fall. Christine Gunlogson's central claim is that the meaning and use of both kinds of sentences must be understood in terms of the meaning of their defining formal elements, namely declarative sentence type and rising versus falling intonation. Gunlogson supports that claim through an investigation of the use of declaratives as questions. On one hand, Gunlogson demonstrates that rising and falling declaratives share an aspect of conventional meaning attributable to their declarative form, distinguishing them both from the corresponding polar interrogative (Is it raining?) and constraining their use as questions. On the other hand, since (1) and (2) constitute a minimal pair, differing only in intonation, systematic differences in character and function between them--in particular, the relative "naturalness" of (1) as a question compared to (2) --must be located in the contrast between the fall and the rise. To account for these two sets of differences, Gunlogson gives a compositional account of rising and falling declaratives under which declarative form expresses commitment to the propositional content of the declarative. Rising versus falling intonation on declaratives is responsible for attribution of the commitment to the Addressee versus the Speaker, respectively. The result is an inherent contextual "bias" associated with declaratives, which constitutes the crucial point of difference with interrogatives. The compositional analysis is implemented in the framework of context update semantics (Heim 1982 and others), using an articulated version of the Common Ground (Stalnaker 1978) that distinguishes the commitments of the individual discourse participants. Restrictions on the use of declaratives as questions, as well as differences between rising and falling declaratives as questions, are shown to follow from this account. Gunlogson argues that neither rising nor falling declaratives are inherently questioning--rather, the questioning function of declaratives arises through the interaction of sentence type, intonation, and context.

General

Imprint: Routledge
Country of origin: United Kingdom
Series: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics
Release date: February 2014
First published: 2003
Authors: Christine Gunlogson
Dimensions: 229 x 152mm (L x W)
Format: Paperback
Pages: 124
ISBN-13: 978-0-415-86507-4
Categories: Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Semantics (meaning) > General
Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure > General
LSN: 0-415-86507-7
Barcode: 9780415865074

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners