Ever since 1942, when Carl Hempel declared that historical
events are explained by subsuming them under laws governing the
occurrence of similar events, philosophers have debated the
validity of explanations based on "covering laws." In The Logic of
Historical Explanation, Clayton Roberts provides a key to
understanding the role of covering laws in historical explanation.
He does so by distinguishing between their use at the macro- and
micro- levels, a distinction that no other scholar has made.
Roberts contends that the positivists were right to believe that
covering laws are indispensable in historical explanations but
wrong to think that these laws apply to macro-events (such as wars
and revolutions). Similarly, the humanists were right to declare
that historians do not explain the occurrence of macro-events by
subsuming them under covering laws but wrong to deny the role of
covering laws in tracing the course of events leading to the
macro-event. Roberts resolves this debate by showing that, though
useless in explaining macro-events, covering laws are indispensable
in connecting the steps in an explanatory narrative. He then sets
forth the logic of an explanatory narrative, explores the nature of
rational explanation, and distinguishes the logic of historical
interpretation from the logic of historical explanation.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!