Modern warfare is almost always multilateral to one degree or
another, requiring countries to cooperate as allies or coalition
partners. Yet as the war in Afghanistan has made abundantly clear,
multilateral cooperation is neither straightforward nor guaranteed.
Countries differ significantly in what they are willing to do and
how and where they are willing to do it. Some refuse to participate
in dangerous or offensive missions. Others change tactical
objectives with each new commander. Some countries defer to their
commanders while others hold them to strict account.
"NATO in Afghanistan" explores how government structures and
party politics in NATO countries shape how battles are waged in the
field. Drawing on more than 250 interviews with senior officials
from around the world, David Auerswald and Stephen Saideman find
that domestic constraints in presidential and single-party
parliamentary systems--in countries such as the United States and
Britain respectively--differ from those in countries with coalition
governments, such as Germany and the Netherlands. As a result,
different countries craft different guidelines for their forces
overseas, most notably in the form of military caveats, the
often-controversial limits placed on deployed troops.
Providing critical insights into the realities of alliance and
coalition warfare, "NATO in Afghanistan" also looks at non-NATO
partners such as Australia, and assesses NATO's performance in the
2011 Libyan campaign to show how these domestic political dynamics
are by no means unique to Afghanistan.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!