Whether philosophy of science is crucially tied down to
epistemological justification is a significant topic of current
debates. This book sets out an extensive argument against the
foundationalist theories of justification. In developing a project
of a hermeneutic context of constitution, it advocates new life for
philosophy of science. At the present, there seems to be no middle
ground between analytic approaches to scientific knowledge and
hermeneutic conceptions of scientific research. The author brings
together aspects of an ontology of the interpretative constitution
of research objects and a holistic picture of science's cognitive
structures. Yet the book is by no means an attempt to reconcile
holistic epistemology and hermeneutic phenomenology. The context of
constitution goes beyond both enterprises...
General
Imprint: |
Springer-Verlag New York
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Series: |
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 247 |
Release date: |
June 2006 |
First published: |
2006 |
Authors: |
Dimitri Ginev
|
Dimensions: |
297 x 210 x 15mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Hardcover
|
Pages: |
258 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-4020-4712-1 |
Categories: |
Books >
Science & Mathematics >
Science: general issues >
Philosophy of science
|
LSN: |
1-4020-4712-6 |
Barcode: |
9781402047121 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!