Books > Science & Mathematics > Science: general issues > Philosophy of science
|
Buy Now
The Four-Category Ontology - A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R3,314
Discovery Miles 33 140
You Save: R562
(14%)
|
|
The Four-Category Ontology - A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
E. J. Lowe sets out and defends his theory of what there is. His
four-category ontology is a metaphysical system that recognizes two
fundamental categorial distinctions which cut across each other to
generate four fundamental ontological categories. The distinctions
are between the particular and the universal and between the
substantial and the non-substantial. The four categories thus
generated are substantial particulars, non-substantial particulars,
substantial universals and non-substantial universals.
Non-substantial universals include properties and relations,
conceived as universals. Non-substantial particulars include
property-instances and relation-instances, otherwise known as
non-relational and relational tropes or modes. Substantial
particulars include propertied individuals, the paradigm examples
of which are persisting, concrete objects. Substantial universals
are otherwise known as substantial kinds and include as paradigm
examples natural kinds of persisting objects. This ontology has a
lengthy pedigree, many commentators attributing it to Aristotle on
the basis of certain passages in his apparently early work, the
Categories. At various times during the history of Western
philosophy, it has been revived or rediscovered, but it has never
found universal favour, perhaps on account of its apparent lack of
parsimony as well as its commitment to universals. In pursuit of
ontological economy, metaphysicians have generally preferred to
recognize fewer than four fundamental ontological categories.
However, Occam's razor stipulates only that we should not multiply
entities beyond necessity; Lowe argues that the four-category
ontology has an explanatory power unrivalled by more parsimonious
systems, and that this counts decisively in its favour. He shows
that it provides a powerful explanatory framework for a unified
account of causation, dispositions, natural laws, natural necessity
and many other related matters, such as the semantics of
counterfactual conditionals and the character of the truthmaking
relation. As such, it constitutes a thoroughgoing metaphysical
foundation for natural science.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.