According to conventional wisdom, American social policy has
always been exceptional--exceptionally stingy and backwards. But
Edwin Amenta reminds us here that sixty years ago the United States
led the world in spending on social provision. He combines history
and political theory to account for this surprising fact--and to
explain why the country's leading role was short-lived.
The orthodox view is that American social policy began in the
1930s as a two-track system of miserly "welfare" for the unemployed
and generous "social security" for the elderly. However, Amenta
shows that the New Deal was in fact a bold program of relief,
committed to providing jobs and income support for the unemployed.
Social security was, by comparison, a policy afterthought. By the
late 1930s, he shows, the U.S. pledged more of its gross national
product to relief programs than did any other major industrial
country.
Amenta develops and uses an institutional politics theory to
explain how social policy expansion was driven by northern
Democrats, state-based reformers, and political outsiders. And he
shows that retrenchment in the 1940s was led by politicians from
areas where beneficiaries of relief were barred from voting. He
also considers why some programs were nationalized, why some states
had far-reaching "little New Deals," and why Britain--otherwise so
similar to the United States--adopted more generous social
programs. "Bold Relief" will transform our understanding of the
roots of American social policy and of the institutional and
political dynamics that will shape its future.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!