Books > Business & Economics > Business & management > Business strategy
|
Buy Now
Sustaining Trade Reform - Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru (Paperback)
Loot Price: R888
Discovery Miles 8 880
|
|
Sustaining Trade Reform - Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru (Paperback)
Series: Directions in Development
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Factually, the principal finding of this book is that the trade
policy reforms introduced by Peru in the 1990s have continued over
several changes of president, whereas similar reforms in Argentina
have been reversed. In both countries, the reforms included the
introduction of new mechanisms for managing trade policy as well as
the reduction of restrictions. Throughout the decade beginning in
2000, Peru's liberalisation expanded. The new institutions became
more robust, and through them pressures for protection were
effectively contained. At the same time, Argentine trade policy
returned to the high-protection import substitution regime in place
before the 1990s reforms. Multiple restrictions have been imposed,
mostly through a reversion to informal methods that abjure the
governance characteristics that the 1990s reforms introduced. The
difference between the two cases cannot be explained by economic
parameters such as resource endowments or external shocks. Peru's
reforms manifest the buoyant and confident attitude toward the
global economy that reform leaders were able to introduce into
Peruvian politics. In the words of former president Alan Garcia,
there is an eagerness to "climb up on the wave of growth." In
comparison, Argentina's current development strategy sees
international trade as detrimental to Argentina's interests unless
participation by Argentine buyers and sellers is guided by
government intervention. The Peruvian case provides examples of
successfully managing the politics of reform and the technical
aspects of policy so as to establish transparent and participatory
processes that weigh accurately the impact of trade policy on all
affected domestic parties. The Argentine case demonstrates that the
World Trade Organisation legal system is not an effective restraint
on a government that wants to revert to an import substitution
regime. International cooperation has been useful when it has
recognised and influenced domestic sovereignty over economic
regulation; however, it is not been useful when approached as a
matter of international regulation of national actions.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.