John Locke's theory of personal identity underlies all modern
discussion of the nature of persons and selves--yet it is widely
thought to be wrong. In his new book, Galen Strawson argues that in
fact it is Locke's critics who are wrong, and that the famous
objections to his theory are invalid. Indeed, far from refuting
Locke, they illustrate his fundamental point.
Strawson argues that the root error is to take Locke's use of
the word "person" only in the ordinary way, as merely a term for a
standard persisting thing, like "human being." In actuality, Locke
uses "person" primarily as a forensic or legal term geared
specifically to questions about praise and blame, punishment and
reward. In these terms, your personal identity is roughly a matter
of those of your past actions that you are still responsible for
because you are still "conscious" of them in Locke's special sense
of that word.
Clearly and vigorously argued, this is an important
contribution both to the history of philosophy and to the
contemporary philosophy of personal identity.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!