What were the intentions of early China s historians? Modern
readers must contend with the tension between the narrators
moralizing commentary and their description of events. Although
these historians had notions of evidence, it is not clear to what
extent they valued what contemporary scholars would deem hard
facts. Offering an innovative approach to premodern historical
documents, Garret P. S. Olberding argues that the speeches of court
advisors reveal subtle strategies of information management in the
early monarchic context. Olberding focuses on those addresses
concerning military campaigns where evidence would be important in
guiding immediate social and political policy. His analysis reveals
the sophisticated conventions that governed the imperial advisor s
logic and suasion in critical state discussions, which were
specifically intended to counter anticipated doubts. Dubious Facts
illuminates both the decision-making processes that informed early
Chinese military campaigns and the historical records that
represent them."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!