Both in science and in practical affairs we reason by combining
facts only inconclusively supported by evidence. Building on an
abstract understanding of this process of combination, this book
constructs a new theory of epistemic probability. The theory draws
on the work of A. P. Dempster but diverges from Depster's viewpoint
by identifying his "lower probabilities" as epistemic probabilities
and taking his rule for combining "upper and lower probabilities"
as fundamental.
The book opens with a critique of the well-known Bayesian theory
of epistemic probability. It then proceeds to develop an
alternative to the additive set functions and the rule of
conditioning of the Bayesian theory: set functions that need only
be what Choquet called "monotone of order of infinity." and
Dempster's rule for combining such set functions. This rule,
together with the idea of "weights of evidence," leads to both an
extensive new theory and a better understanding of the Bayesian
theory. The book concludes with a brief treatment of statistical
inference and a discussion of the limitations of epistemic
probability. Appendices contain mathematical proofs, which are
relatively elementary and seldom depend on mathematics more
advanced that the binomial theorem.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!