Arguing that our attachment to Aristotelian modes of discourse
makes a revision of their conceptual foundations long overdue, the
author proposes the consideration of unacknowledged factors that
play a central role in argument itself. These are in particular the
subjective imprint and the dynamics of argumentation. Their
inclusion in a four-dimensional framework (subjective-objective,
structural-procedural) and the focus on thesis validity allow for a
more realistic view of our discourse practice. Exhaustive analyses
of fascinating historical and contemporary arguments are provided.
These range from Columbus s advocacy of the Western Passage to
India, over the trial of King Louis XVI during the French
Revolution, to today s highly charged controversies surrounding
euthanasia and embryo research.
Excavating foundational issues such as the purpose of argument
itself (assent of an audience or critical examination of validity
claims) and the contested role of argument as a generator of
knowledge, the book culminates in a discussion of the relationship
between rationality and reasonableness and criticizes the
restrictions of rational argument relying on fixed logical,
economic or cultural criteria that in reality are mutable. Here, a
true, open argument requires the infusion of Paul Lorenzen s
principle of transsubjectivity, which recognizes but transcends the
partiality of the individual and which can be seen in the pragmatic
and expanding consensus that humanity can control itself to
safeguard the future of a fragile, damaged world."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!