Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Semantics (meaning) > Pragmatics
|
Buy Now
Attributing Knowledge - What It Means to Know Something (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R2,321
Discovery Miles 23 210
|
|
Attributing Knowledge - What It Means to Know Something (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
In Attributing Knowledge, Jody Azzouni challenges philosophical
conventions about what it means to know something. He argues that
the restrictive conditions philosophers place on knowers only hold
in special cases; knowledge can be attributed to babies,
sophisticated animals (great apes, orcas), unsophisticated animals
(bees), and machinery (drones, driverless cars). Azzouni also gives
a fresh defense of fallibilism. Relying on lexical semantics and
ordinary usage, he shows that there are no knowledge norms for
assertion or action. He examines everyday cases of knowledge
challenge and attribution to show many recent and popular
epistemological positions are wrong. By providing a long-sought
intelligible characterization of knowledge attribution, Azzouni
explains why the concept has puzzled philosophers so long, and he
solves longstanding and recent puzzles that have perplexed
epistemologists-including the dogmatism paradox, Gettier puzzles,
and the surprise-exam paradox. "This is a terrific book, full of
surprises. For instance, Chapter 9 is full of points that are
original, insightful, and useful in helping to resolve stale
debates. I especially liked the points that we don't ordinarily
describe someone as losing knowledge by gaining defeating evidence,
that "knows" is vague and tri-scoped, that vagueness needn't be
explained by appeal to precise metasemantic machinery, and that
Williamson's anti-luminosity argument founders on the fact that
knowledge doesn't require confidence. Bravo!" -Ram Neta, University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Praise for Jody Azzouni's Ontology
without Borders: "Azzouni offers a very strong drink, proposing
that we do without central elements of what almost anyone would
call logic or ontology. His arguments are serious and wide-ranging.
If he's right, the reader will have learned something very
important. If he's wrong, then the reader who figures out how he
went wrong will also have learned something very important. Not
every book has this feature." -Michael Gorman, The Catholic
University of America
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.