Normativity concerns what we ought to think or do and the
evaluations we make. For example, we say that we ought to think
consistently, we ought to keep our promises, or that Mozart is a
better composer than Salieri. Yet what philosophical moral can we
draw from the apparent absence of normativity in the scientific
image of the world? For scientific naturalists, the moral is that
the normative must be reduced to the nonnormative, while for
nonnaturalists, the moral is that there must be a transcendent
realm of norms.
"Naturalism and Normativity" engages with both sides of this
debate. Essays explore philosophical options for understanding
normativity in the space between scientific naturalism and Platonic
supernaturalism. They articulate a liberal conception of philosophy
that is neither reducible to the sciences nor completely
independent of them--yet one that maintains the right to call
itself naturalism. Contributors think in new ways about the
relations among the scientific worldview, our experience of norms
and values, and our movements in the space of reason. Detailed
discussions include the relationship between philosophy and
science, physicalism and ontological pluralism, the realm of the
ordinary, objectivity and subjectivity, truth and justification,
and the liberal naturalisms of Donald Davidson, John Dewey, John
McDowell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!