Books > Computing & IT > Applications of computing > Artificial intelligence
|
Buy Now
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - 6th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2009, Budapest, Hungary, May 12, 2009. Revised Selected and Invited Papers (Paperback, Edition.)
Loot Price: R1,481
Discovery Miles 14 810
|
|
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - 6th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2009, Budapest, Hungary, May 12, 2009. Revised Selected and Invited Papers (Paperback, Edition.)
Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6057
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
This volume contains revised versions of the papers presented at
the sixth e- tion of the International Workshop on Argumentation in
Multi-Agent Systems,
(ArgMAS2009),heldinBudapest,Hungary,inassociationwiththe8thInter-
tional Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
(AAMAS 2009) in May 2009. Previous ArgMAS workshops have been held
in New York City, USA (2004),Utrecht, The Netherlands
(2005),Hakodate, Japan (2006), Honolulu, USA (2007) and Estoril,
Portugal (2008). The event has now clearlyestablisheditselfonthe
internationalcalendaramongresearchersinc- putational argument and
dialectics. A brief word to explain these topics is in order.
Di?erent agents within a multi-agent system (MAS) potentially have
di?erential access to information and di?erent capabilities,
di?erent beliefs, di?erent preferences and desires, and di?erent
goals. A key aspect of the scienti?c and engineering study of mul-
agentsystemsthereforehasbeenthedevelopmentofmethodsandproceduresfor
identifying, assessing, reconciling, arbitrating between, managing,
and mitig- ing suchdi?erences.
Marketmechanismsandvotingproceduresaretwo methods fordealing with
thesedi?erences. Argumentationisanother. Argumentationcan be
understood as the formal interaction of di?erent arguments for and
against some conclusion (e. g. , a proposition, an action
intention, a preference, etc. ). An agent may use argumentation
techniques to perform individual reasoning for itself alone, in
order to resolve con?icting evidence or to decide between c-
?icting goals it may have. Two or more agents may also jointly use
dialectical argumentationto identify,
express,andreconciledi?erencesbetweenthemselves, by means of
interactions such as negotiation, persuasion, inquiry, and joint -
liberation.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|