National DNA databanks were initially established to catalogue
the identities of violent criminals and sex offenders. However,
since the mid-1990s, forensic DNA databanks have in some cases
expanded to include people merely arrested, regardless of whether
they've been charged or convicted of a crime. The public is largely
unaware of these changes and the advances that biotechnology and
forensic DNA science have made possible. Yet many citizens are
beginning to realize that the unfettered collection of DNA profiles
might compromise our basic freedoms and rights.
Two leading authors on medical ethics, science policy, and civil
liberties take a hard look at how the United States has balanced
the use of DNA technology, particularly the use of DNA databanks in
criminal justice, with the privacy rights of its citizenry. Krimsky
and Simoncelli analyze the constitutional, ethical, and
sociopolitical implications of expanded DNA collection in the
United States and compare these findings to trends in the United
Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Germany, and Italy. They explore many
controversial topics, including the legal precedent for taking DNA
from juveniles, the search for possible family members of suspects
in DNA databases, the launch of "DNA dragnets" among local
populations, and the warrantless acquisition by police of so-called
abandoned DNA in the search for suspects. Most intriguing, Krimsky
and Simoncelli explode the myth that DNA profiling is infallible,
which has profound implications for criminal justice.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!